FYI - New WB3 build has been released

[Gadfly]

Sure.  Ground vehicles have been around since the early days of AW; AH didn't think of that all by themselves.  Thus to say that WB is imitating AH for having them is not correct.

[Gadfly]

Funked old buddy, what makes you think WB will fold?  You are starting to sound like Checksix.  Is he you?

[Fishu]

I wonder if it also will fall over its nose  when front wheel gets blown  

[Jigster]

bah those old bi-direction tires hold the orgins of "run flat tires"

The sidewalls are so stiff they can run a long time on 0 pressure. They just won't steer very well and it leaves a tire print about a foot wide.

[funked]

Gadfly go look at iEN's financial reports some time.

[Gadfly]

They suck, but remember that we can't look at HT's or WWIIonline's.  What makes you think theirs are any better?

[funked]

No comment.  

[This message has been edited by funked (edited 05-07-2001).]

[chisel]

OH....MY.....GAWD


Funked is speechless!  

[scout]

A long, long time ago, an ICI type spoketh (paraphrased):

"were going to model tanks, ships also, were just going to model all the planes first"

This has always been the goal for the people who started WB, and now they have split and some are doing it in AH, the other half in WWIIOL.

And HS is continuing in WB, though he may not know it, or maybe he does, he was an old WB vet b4 starting at IEN, I believe he did AW also.

 

Originally posted by Dowding:
Hmmm... it's good to see WB paying homage to AH.