The English football (it's not soccer by the way - I hate that word) league is the most physical in Europe (and maybe the world). Most English players are pretty hard, especially those who were around in the late 80s (Adams, Pierce, Wise) - it's the continental stars that have turned a lot of the young English players into whining rutabagas, who are not worthy of being called English.
Go watch a Sunday league game (amateur) if you ever visit the UK - that shows how tough a game it can be.
Football was never designed to be hands-on physical, unlike rugby or its derivatives, though. I had alot of friends who played rugby at uni - very rough game, I value my face too much to play it at any level above secondary school

. Good to watch though.
I'm not a fan of American sports - although ice hockey is ok (but that's Canadian, right?

).
I enjoyed the olympics - mainly because GB got the most gold medals since 1920. And we kicked everyone's bellybutton at rowing, my favourite sport. We should be up there with France and Germany (given our population) in the medals tables - if only the athletes could be given more money, and have decent facilities. Sydney was a great setting for the games, and avoided the commercialism that spoiled Atlanta, IMO.
Anyone for cricket? Now there's a sport.
[This message has been edited by Dowding (edited 10-04-2000).]