Adolph Gallands Last Interview

[Vudak]

Originally posted by Jackal1
About the wisest move you have made thus far.

Eh, not wise, it would just be overkill.  Anyone who's been around already knows you're one of the BBS' premier bigots.  And if you don't like being compared to a nazi, don't spout their rhetoric.  >Shrug<

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by Vudak
Eh, not wise, it would just be overkill.  Anyone who's been around already knows you're one of the BBS' premier bigots.  And if you don't like being compared to a nazi, don't spout their rhetoric.  >Shrug<

Hey slick...I`ll say it for you.........I don`t like studmuffins. I think they are a disgrace to the human race. I`m certainly not alone in this.
Now you can quit ***** footing around and deal with it.
You wish to call me Nazi? Do it. Be a man about it.
I`d suggest you do this in another thread so we can both get banned and be done with it.
If you find the comaparison there, then I feel for you in the real world.

[Vudak]

Originally posted by Jackal1
Hey slick...I`ll say it for you.........I don`t like studmuffins. I think they are a disgrace to the human race. I`m certainly not alone in this.
Now you can quit ***** footing around and deal with it.
You wish to call me Nazi? Do it. Be a man about it.
I`d suggest you do this in another thread so we can both get banned and be done with it.
If you find the comaparison there, then I feel for you in the real world.

Well, when someone suggests that a group of people are subhuman, should not expect human rights, and ought to be deported...  Yep, I'd say I find the comparison.

Sorry for the hijack, everyone.  I just found it amusing that one who claims to detest Nazis so much would advocate such "ideals."

I'll go now

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by Vudak
Well, when someone suggests that a group of people are subhuman, should not expect human rights, and ought to be deported...  Yep, I'd say I find the comparison.  

Then like I said, I feel for you.
Gays are still going to be there whether I agree with their lifestyle or not.
No extermination was suggested by me, nor anyone else I`m aware of, such as done by the Nazis. And once again "gay" is not a race of people. Deported seems to be a term you have confused also.
You have a lot to learn.
I didn`t expect you to come out with it instead of beating around the bush. If you decide your up to it , the different thread offer stands.


 

I'll go now

2nd wise choice.

[Debonair]

kill all the gay nazis!

[Jackal1]

[DREDIOCK]

Originally posted by midnight Target
Seems to me there is a way to tell whether a German who fought in the war is worthy of honor or not. Answer a simple question..

Did you know about the death camps?

Galland as a general officer probably did know. This drops him into the "no honor" catagory as far as I'm concerned.

what does knowing about the camps have to do with anything?

What was he supposed to do? Protest against them and get him and/or his family inturned in one also?

Tell ya what. If given a choice between shooting you or having my family shot.Or inturning you in a camp or having my family inturned

You would loose

I'd be willing ot bet I would suffer the same fate if you were given those choices

[Vudak]

On second thought...  See rules 2, 5, 9, 15.

[Jackal1]

[Shuckins]

Ssspringtimmmee...forrr Hit-lerrr...and Germany!!!

[Jackal1]

Originally posted by DREDIOCK
what does knowing about the camps have to do with anything?

Knowing about them and going along with them are two different things.

 

What was he supposed to do? Protest against them and get him and/or his family inturned in one also?

Someone with his contacts could have possibly done way more than protest. Organize comes to mind. When you see something going very wrong within your country, but you still go along with it, when in a position such as his, you have to make the choice of turning your back on the people of your country and your country itself  or organizing against it. It`s the difference between traitor and patriot , so to speak.

Tell ya what. If given a choice between shooting you or having my family shot.Or inturning you in a camp or having my family inturned

Nothing new there. Some are willing to stand their ground for what they know is right, some sell out .

I'd be willing ot bet I would suffer the same fate if you were given those choice

That would be a bet you would lose. Not only in my case, but many, many in this country.

[B@tfinkV]

the detonation of two atomic bombs over two civillian targets is IMO, a serious war crime.




as for me being 'America hating' ..... at what point did you fail to understand the term 'we dropped'....looks like im throwing the blame at the allies, but seeing as germans did alot of the work lets blame them too for the bombs.

And infact, seeing as we were at war with japan, lets blame them too.




whole damn world always looking to find blame for their own shortcomings, so when an opposing statement is made, the majority of people become defencive on a personal level almost instantly, its very common and i do it myself, so dont worry.

[DREDIOCK]

Originally posted by Jackal1
Knowing about them and going along with them are two different things.

 

Someone with his contacts could have possibly done way more than protest. Organize comes to mind. When you see something going very wrong within your country, but you still go along with it, when in a position such as his, you have to make the choice of turning your back on the people of your country and your country itself  or organizing against it. It`s the difference between traitor and patriot , so to speak.

 

Nothing new there. Some are willing to stand their ground for what they know is right, some sell out .

 

That would be a bet you would lose. Not only in my case, but many, many in this country.

If it were just me. that would be one thing.
But my family is another.
If given a choice between my family suffering or yours...Yea. I'd sell out
I think most people would also.
Course you may be the exeption

[DREDIOCK]

Originally posted by B@tfinkV
the detonation of two atomic bombs over two civillian targets is IMO, a serious war crime.

I think. Or I should say I know alot of WWII vets that would dissagree with you.

This is another classic example of trying to apply todays standards to past historical events.

At the time We were at war with the Axis. Not just their soldiers but the countries as a whole. We practiced what is known as total war. Where you are at war with a country in its entirety. To break the will of its people to fight.

Sherman practiced the same tactics in the now famous "March to the sea"
Was he also a War criminal?

The Japaneese werent exactly know for being kind to the populaces of the territories they captured either. Neither were the Germans.
Both took the gloves off and practiced total war
As the saying goes. "What goes around, comes around"

Tis a pity we are now afraid to take the gloves off anymore.
If we did, our current problems would be over very quickly.

We've gotten too soft.
A weakness I fear will be our downfall

[B@tfinkV]

I think. Or I should say I know alot of WWII vets that would dissagree with you.

This is another classic example of trying to apply todays standards to past historical events.

and your opposing opinion is a classic example of excusing what one nation considers fair play today and in that past with what another might think. just because 'we dont think' nukes are good thing in this day and age, someone who got nuked a while back might not agree

At the time We were at war with the Axis. Not just their soldiers but the countries as a whole. We practiced what is known as total war. Where you are at war with a country in its entirety. To break the will of its people to fight.

a very true point and not one i am about to argue about in any way.

Sherman practiced the same tactics in the now famous "March to the sea"
Was he also a War criminal?

is human vs human war on its own a crime by all together? to be a war criminal, you must do more than your duty in hurting your enemies. related to the nuke drops, the pilots are not the criminals, the people who decided to use it are, only in my opinion. killing militants is what war is about, killing civilians happens in war and is to be expected, evapotating a city is going too far.

The Japaneese werent exactly know for being kind to the populaces of the territories they captured either. Neither were the Germans.
Both took the gloves off and practiced total war
As the saying goes. "What goes around, comes around"

no, and they got what they knew was coming if they carried on fighting. should the allies have acted differently? probably not, but that doesnt make it any less of a crime to humanity.

Tis a pity we are now afraid to take the gloves off anymore.
If we did, our current problems would be over very quickly.

We've gotten too soft.
A weakness I fear will be our downfall


soft? we've gone hyper agresive, controlling anyone and anything that isnt a military match for us and doesnt please us.

i still see films of soldiers in warzones shouting warcries as they get another insurgent headshot on camera, we arnt soft its just the non combatants that have life so damn easy that think its all going gooey.


i dont doubt that your post has 100% validity in the minds of many, just throwing some opposing ideas, and a not targeting you at all by cutting up your statements.

S!