Author Topic: Mr Ripley!  (Read 212 times)

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Mr Ripley!
« on: May 01, 2006, 10:29:06 AM »
For some reason we lost the other thread.. I did want to reply though, you made some interesting points. Your last post:

Quote
Hangtime you are correct, except the russians were not stopped by 'armed populace' or 'militia' at all. It was the mobilized army run by the government.

My criticism was to lazs's aspirations for a volatile type of society where trouble is solved through a civil war instead of a democratic process. I would never want to live in that kind of society.

As stated earlier, I love to shoot guns too and have nothing against registered gun ownership. However I'm extremely strongly against handing out permits to people with any kind of criminal records or especially mental history. Controlling that requires registration - and that's something where lazs also disagrees strongly because of his paranoia of the government and potential 'collection of weapons' scenario.

Did you know that after the peace agreement in finland a group of officers organized a weapon hiding program all over the country? They hid hundreds of thousands of light weapons and ammo, mines, bazookas etc. to the forests and house basements. They are so plentiful that new caches are discovered even today although they're already rendered useless in most cases. They were preparing for a guerilla war in case the communists would overpower the country after the peace agreement.

The difference with me and lazs is that we're both prepared for armed combat if need be, I just don't see my government as my enemy but something across the border instead.


It's my understanding that up through the Winter War, your Milita, operated on the Swiss model of every able bodied male citizen trained and issued a weapon; had proven to be exceptionally effective at wrestling the Russian Bear to a standstill through three invasions. It's also my understanding that at the cessetion of hostilites from the winter war, when the kajeila (sp) pennensuila was ceeded further russian terms dictated the disbanding of the militia... which was done; the populace turned in their issue arms to a local armory. But, not all of them.. as you noted, for the reasons noted. ;)

I dunno about YOU guys there in Finland.. but there's quite a bit of respect here in the 'american gun culture' for Finlands amazing history of defiance with regards to Russia.. and it's because your citizens exibited a determination and resolve against incredible adversity with light infantry and militia, outdated gear and equipment and little outside support to retain your own government, military and rights aginst first the czar and then the Soviets .. what freedoms you have were won by men that fought when the time came for a decision.

Now.. on to the last paragraph... an interesting truisim is that governments can be usurped by coup.. military overthrow of legitimate elected governments is not very uncommon. We came very close to a similar situation here at least twice.. once in my lifetime over the cuban crisis, once during the war of 1812.

Our government has on quite a few occasions sponsored just such a senario in several latin american and asian countries, in my lifetime.. so the threat of subversion and usurpation of legitimate governement sponsored by a forigen government is NOT at all uncommon. In many countries in Africa in the last 50 years that's exactly how regime change occurs. So when suddenly, the governemnt IS the enemy... and no Forigen Army crossed the border... and you do not have an armed population... you have no choices at all, do you?

Lastly.. it is illegal here for a felon or a documented nutball to own a firearm. Whatever type of weapon I would care to purchase in my state requires documentaion and a waiting period. The point is regardless of the legality; criminals are not likely to pay much attention to laws when it comes to weapons posession or aquistion.

If a nutbag drives a car into a crowd of people, do we put the car on trial? Is chevrolet arrested?

We tend to think it's a bit more rational to punish Criminals, not guns. We do however punish very harshly when a gun is used in the commission of a crime. 'Use a gun, go to jail' is the sentancing standard in virtually every state.

Cheers!
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Mr Ripley!
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2006, 11:16:32 AM »
In any consideration of the use of the military on American citizens it is well to consider that the members of the Armed Forces are themselves citizens first and soldiers second. (for those not trying to earn citizenship by their service) Each and every member of the military takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution on the United States. Note I did not state the government, the Constitution. That and the lawfull orders of the officers above them. Emphasis on lawful, as has already been held in court, the excuse of following orders does not make a legal defense.

Having been a member I can tell you that the members of the military would have a very hard time indeed with any orders to use lethal force on the citizens of this country if that force was ordered in contravention of the Constitution.  That may well be one of the reasons for the law preventing the use of the military to enforce civiian law (posse commitatus) directly.

In other words, do not assume the military will simply roll over like a lap dog and go out to suppress the population.

As to the tank at waco (I know someone will bring it up) it was not intended to be used as lethal force, but as a hardened delivery mode for tear gas. Had they had a lethal use in mind they would just have fired shells into the house or done a wrecking job on it by driving through the corners of the structure.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Mr Ripley!
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2006, 11:58:27 AM »
Hangtime I think you're confusing our current army model with militia type of organizations. We still have a defense model based on mandatory draft - every adult male is obliged to serve in the army. Some nutjobs refuse armed service and they're put for a slightly longer period to civillian jobs, retirement homes etc.

While practically every finnish man has served and is trained for some function in the army there is very little activity on civillian side. Our country is very stable at the moment, people are doing generally well and everyone are more interested in their careers instead of running in the forests shooting guns.

I have to admit I've thought about joining the voluntary corps just to get a chance to shoot with assault rifles again. But OTOH the activities contain regular meetings, duties and generally boring stuff that I just can't cope with it. I work as a traveling consultant and sometimes I'm out of city for 5 days a week.

I want my free time for my family and own relaxation.

Which part of US do you live in btw? If I should wonder off to your direction (work related). :D
« Last Edit: May 01, 2006, 12:00:57 PM by MrRiplEy[H] »
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
Mr Ripley!
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2006, 12:36:16 PM »
It's much like your system over here.. without manditory service for all young adults. We have the regular army, and a national guard, made up of young men and women that train alongside the regular army troops but only do service one weekend a month.. unless the unit is mobilized; which is what has happened with about half our national guard force, for service in Iraq.

In addition, once discharged from military service (national guard or reg army) every man becomes a defacto member of the inactive reserve. I've never seen an 'inactive reserve' call-up in my lifetime.

Lastly, in addition to the forces described above we do have A State Milita Force here in the US.. seperate form the federal military yet still a credible force in many states.. here's a fair description of the orginization and it's function:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Defense_Force

As well as a link to the NY State Guard:

http://www.dmna.state.ny.us/nyg/nyg.html

... and the Empire State Militia

http://www.geocities.com/esm2nddiv/conduct.html

You see, not all of us.. but far, far more than you'd ever think; do understand what an amazing thing the balance of power is in this county... we respect the Federal Government... but we retain the basic independence of the PEOPLE. The state governement supports and funds the militia concept that was the original backbone of armed resistance to British Rule OR[/i] the possibility of a federal government that would act to suspend the constitutional duly elected government of this nation of 50 independent states.

Yes, civil war is a hateful concept. Yes the Federal Government would be expected to 'preserve the union' against state succession.. but that's not the only threat we concern ourselves with!
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.