Author Topic: Star Trek XI  (Read 607 times)

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Re: Star Trek XI
« Reply #15 on: July 31, 2006, 04:05:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Matt Damon is listed to play James T. Kirk. Should be interesting. I think Shatner rocks, but unlike Shatner, Damon can actually act. :)

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/

I've heard that these friends of LePaul's (Non-star war fans, but fanatics nonetheless) will be trying out for the new roles:

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Re: Re: Star Trek XI
« Reply #16 on: July 31, 2006, 05:23:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
I've heard that these friends of LePaul's (Non-star war fans, but fanatics nonetheless) will be trying out for the new roles:


So... I'm guessing that they've amassed a total of 0.5 dates between them. :aok
sand

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
Star Trek XI
« Reply #17 on: July 31, 2006, 05:38:16 PM »
Quote
So... I'm guessing that they've amassed a total of 0.5 dates between them.


Their dates are giving us the Vulcan greeting in that photo.

Charon

Offline BlueJ1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5826
Star Trek XI
« Reply #18 on: July 31, 2006, 05:40:16 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tarmac


Matt Damon!



:rofl  I was hoping no one else would post it before me.
U.S.N.
Aviation Electrician MH-60S
OEF 08-09'

Offline MrBill

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 776
Star Trek XI
« Reply #19 on: July 31, 2006, 06:19:02 PM »
Well it looks like the dead franchise is still moving. I guess that makes it a zombie franchise. Star Trek XI is moving ahead, and at Comic-Con this week revealed an initial poster that looks old school Star Trek.

On top of that, the whole "Matt Damon as Captain Kirk" thing just won't go away. The Internet Movie Database (IMDB) now has Matt listed as playing James T. Kirk. But then again... we all know how unreliable the IMDB is for movies that aren't actually out yet. Remember, they also had Paul Betany listed as The Joker for the next Batman flick.

Personally, and for the record, I still don't believe Matt Damon will do this project. There doesn't seem to be any upside for him in it. But who knows right? Strangers things have happened.

So what does all this mean?

I've said it before... Star Trek is a dead franchise. I've also said that the only way they're going to breath new life into it is if they do a radical departure from the existing formula. Do one of the following:

1) Restart the franchise with a whole new vision much like what Battlestar Galactica did. Get a blonde Scotty or a female Kirk even.

2) Focus on something OTHER than the damn Federation. As Doug suggested, do a whole film just on the Klingon Empire or something.

3) We're all sick to death of the moral 100% purity of everyone on a damn starship. Get real. Have the captain nailing the first officers wife, have an engineer with a drug problem, have a security chief who hates his job, have a helmsman who dislikes the captain and struggles with depression. Everyone on Star Trek is so squealing sanitized that it makes it unwatchable.

4) Screw the Trekkies. Don't make a new Star Trek trying to please those hard core Trekkie fans. They are a dying breed and haven't helped with any of the other projects in over a decade. Where were they when Enterprise couldn't stay on the air because of the bad ratings? Where were they when all the Star Trek movies have bombed at the box office? Screw them. Make the best movie you can without one lick of thought to the Trekkies. Don't box yourselves in.

If a new Star Trek project doesn't embrace at least 2 of the above... then Star Trek XI is just going to be a zombie. A dead thing that's still walking around.

John Campea July 2006
We do not stop playing because we grow old
We grow old because we stop playing

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Star Trek XI
« Reply #20 on: July 31, 2006, 06:20:31 PM »
Mr. Campea sounds bitter.
sand

Offline BlkKnit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2090
Star Trek XI
« Reply #21 on: July 31, 2006, 06:44:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
Mr. Campea sounds bitter.


And, apparently he takes this all very seriously.................... ..........

Be great to see a new trek flick...but for petes sake DONT change the formula....might as well not call it star trek if its not, umm, star trek.

Lets re-do Aces High, but with ......race cars, yeah!

cripes...change the formula? :huh

Once a Knight is Never Enough

Offline Grayeagle

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1488
Star Trek XI
« Reply #22 on: July 31, 2006, 08:44:16 PM »
yanno .. there are a slew of decent books based on the 'old school' franchise that could make decent movies (I know ..my wife got me hooked on em and I have a bunch in a box, somewhere ).

They'd just have to put out a casting call for crew ..Shatner and crew were the folks that brought it alive,  who's next to keep it goin :)

-GE (misses the 'first' Mr. Savik terribly ..she *rocked*)
'The better I shoot ..the less I have to manuever'
-GE

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Star Trek XI
« Reply #23 on: July 31, 2006, 10:11:42 PM »
They've made 10 of those turds now?  Holy Crap.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Star Trek XI
« Reply #24 on: July 31, 2006, 10:43:24 PM »
Personally, I think 2, 4, 6, 7, and 8 were pretty darn good, myself.  Just a matter of taste, I guess.
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
Star Trek XI
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2006, 11:07:31 PM »
As a generations fan growing up I liked the "generations" movies myself.  It's not so much that they where GREAT movies, they just showed Genereations in a different light and for longer than an hour/commercial free.

Just my .02$