Author Topic: Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda  (Read 1192 times)

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2006, 06:12:31 PM »
And this stuff illustrates why people should only watch Fox News!!!  Get the real news, without spin or agenda.

Long live Bill O'Reilly!!!
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline 68Hawk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1365
      • 68th Lightning Lancers
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2006, 07:27:35 AM »
I posted this on another related thread:

Happens on all sides!!!

CNN and Fox are no different, and their supposed 'credibility' almost makes them the worst.

Outfoxed is a really good documentary:
http://www.informationclearinghouse...article7798.htm

Spin is also excellent:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...181953466797353

direct from the tulips mouth
68th Lightning Lancers
Fear the reaper no more fear the Lancers!
http://www.68thlightninglancers.net

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2006, 07:48:37 AM »
The guy who messed up the photo has been fired. Its great that these guys are busted, but to be fair that alteration did nothing to make the photo any more or less "shocking" so that was prolly not the intent.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2006, 07:59:51 AM »
Nilsen, it's no less fabrication.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #19 on: August 14, 2006, 08:04:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot
Nilsen, it's no less fabrication.


sure is..

never said anything else.

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #20 on: August 14, 2006, 08:16:19 AM »
The Reuters photographer isn't the only one guilty of fraud.

http://aish.com/jewishissues/mediao..._in_Lebanon.asp


Links dead now.

Offline Edbert1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1539
      • http://www.edbert.net
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #21 on: August 14, 2006, 08:35:27 AM »
How come the shoe is smoking but the car is not?

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #22 on: August 14, 2006, 08:39:34 AM »
The car was a non-smoker.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #23 on: August 14, 2006, 08:40:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert1
How come the shoe is smoking but the car is not?


Japanese car and American shoe? :p




We all know that American cars explode when they crash... Ive seen it on TV

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #24 on: August 14, 2006, 08:41:35 AM »
Edbert it's because the shoe is a smoker.  That's why it is dead, it smoked too many cigarettes.  The helpful photographer propped it up on the little rock so it would die in relative comfort.  The car appears to have died a long time ago and it's skeleton is there merely to enhance the message that smoking kills.

Seriously, I dunno why only the shoe is smoking.  Ask cnn since they're the retards that posted up 2 different versions of the same faked scene.  The filenames of the photos I linked are the original filenames from the CNN website so if you ask about them, they should have records of who shot them, who bought them, and what idiots posted them on the web.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Edbert1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1539
      • http://www.edbert.net
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #25 on: August 14, 2006, 08:45:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by eagl
Edbert it's because the shoe is a smoker.  That's why it is dead, it smoked too many cigarettes.  The helpful photographer propped it up on the little rock so it would die in relative comfort.  The car appears to have died a long time ago and it's skeleton is there merely to enhance the message that smoking kills.

Seriously, I dunno why only the shoe is smoking.  Ask cnn since they're the retards that posted up 2 different versions of the same faked scene.  The filenames of the photos I linked are the original filenames from the CNN website so if you ask about them, they should have records of who shot them, who bought them, and what idiots posted them on the web.

Let me ask my question more precisely.

I figued the car was hit by a Maverick, Mk82, or GBU-xx since it is obvious according to local news that the IAF only targets little old ladies getting groceries or soccer-moms with cars full of school kids. I was jsut wondering how the photojournalist (LMFAO) came upon the scene of destruction so quickly that the shoe was still smoking yet the car that was just hit by Israeli terrorists was extinguished.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2006, 08:52:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert1
Let me ask my question more precisely.

I figued the car was hit by a Maverick, Mk82, or GBU-xx since it is obvious according to local news that the IAF only targets little old ladies getting groceries or soccer-moms with cars full of school kids. I was jsut wondering how the photojournalist (LMFAO) came upon the scene of destruction so quickly that the shoe was still smoking yet the car that was just hit by Israeli terrorists was extinguished.


Well.... assuming the shoe is not "rigged" then the car could have been sitting there from before and the shoe part of a later incident.

The shoe looks rigged tho. Why would a shoe smoke from the inside only?

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #27 on: August 14, 2006, 08:54:51 AM »
If you look at the two photos carefully, you see that in the larger one, the whole scene is washed out and looks sorta smokey.  That photographer has captured the scene accurately, including the fact that he doesn't know how to make his camera accurately represent the actual scene.  In the smaller photo, the area is bright and sunny with a clear sky.  It's like that right after the attack because it's Israel, the Israelis are god's children, and god wanted the weather to be nice while that poor shoe died.

So you see it all makes sense if you assume one of the two photographers has no talent and that God really likes dying Israeli shoes who smoke too much.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #28 on: August 14, 2006, 01:45:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Edbert1
Let me ask my question more precisely.

I figued the car was hit by a Maverick, Mk82, or GBU-xx since it is obvious according to local news that the IAF only targets little old ladies getting groceries or soccer-moms with cars full of school kids. I was jsut wondering how the photojournalist (LMFAO) came upon the scene of destruction so quickly that the shoe was still smoking yet the car that was just hit by Israeli terrorists was extinguished.


WTF are you talking about. I never hit that car, nor did I try to hit on that car. I deny everything and demand proof! :mad:
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Edbert1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1539
      • http://www.edbert.net
Reuters Not So Huidden Agenda
« Reply #29 on: August 14, 2006, 02:04:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
WTF are you talking about. I never hit that car, nor did I try to hit on that car. I deny everything and demand proof! :mad:

:lol
:noid