Author Topic: The planes we truly need most.  (Read 10616 times)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #210 on: June 19, 2008, 06:54:26 AM »
Well, still, AFAIK the HS129 had poor performance, being underpowered.
A boatplane like the Sunderland or the Japanese Mavis (?) would be nice IMHO and add a new depth to the game, taking up from....ports? You had many fighters on floats as well, like the Northrop fighter, and a ....Nakajima?
Sea Hurry would be easy for HTC since the FM is practically there.
Anyway, what is the next one being promoted by HTC?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Gixer

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3189
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #211 on: June 19, 2008, 07:56:53 AM »
These are the planes in my opinon that need to be added the most, because most of them played great roles in WWII.

LaGG
La-3
MiG-3
Yak 1
Yak 3
Yak 5
Yak 7
He-111
Ju-52


Nice list!!  :aok  :D


<S>...-Gixer

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #212 on: June 19, 2008, 04:18:33 PM »
I remember watching wings of the luftwaffe or something like that about the stuka.....the Hs129 was meant to replace the 87 in a dive bomber/ ground attack role.

What we really need, just because it's so damn weird and ugly is a BV 141.
And I'd really like to see Hitech figure out the flight dynamics for it.

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #213 on: June 20, 2008, 06:23:51 PM »
I remember watching wings of the luftwaffe or something like that about the stuka.....the Hs129 was meant to replace the 87 in a dive bomber/ ground attack role.

What we really need, just because it's so damn weird and ugly is a BV 141.
And I'd really like to see Hitech figure out the flight dynamics for it.
was that the german plane with the cockpit in the wing and the engine in the middle 
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #214 on: June 21, 2008, 06:18:57 AM »
no
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline ridley1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 677
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #215 on: June 21, 2008, 07:52:17 AM »
Glock...
that is the one withe the engine in a fuselage, with a separate nacelle for the crrew cockpit.

Weirdest aircraft.....ever!!!!

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #216 on: June 21, 2008, 12:30:08 PM »
Glock...
that is the one withe the engine in a fuselage, with a separate nacelle for the crrew cockpit.

Weirdest aircraft.....ever!!!!
i know would be fun to have in aces high
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Koz

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #217 on: June 21, 2008, 02:23:53 PM »
I agree with the I-16 the Mig and the LaGG.I have read abou these plains and found that they were well designed planes. :aok

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #218 on: June 21, 2008, 02:31:03 PM »
I agree with the I-16 the Mig and the LaGG.I have read abou these plains and found that they were well designed planes. :aok
The MiG-3 and LaGG-3 were horrible. The LaGG was known as the Lacquered Coffin or something to that effect by VVS pilots.

Offline Koz

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 14
      • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #219 on: June 21, 2008, 03:00:42 PM »
How you fly them is what counts. :o

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16330
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #220 on: June 21, 2008, 06:59:52 PM »
There's no use for planes that no one (or maybe 5-10%) will have fun flying in, as long as other historicaly significant planes can also be fun and/or successful in the MAs.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline dirtdart

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1847
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #221 on: June 23, 2008, 08:54:59 AM »
A heavier axis bomber would be cool.  Since the game does not factor in reliability, the bomber b planes would be cool.  The Ju-288, the He-177, and the ME-264 (?) the big four engined one with no cockpit per say.  Those could move out and I recall the project was cancelled because after developing high altitude, high speed airplanes, the ministry decided the premise was no longer valid... go figure. Perhaps internet rumor, more than likely I assume it was resources and technology.  That Jumo 22a engine in the Ju-288 was wicked.  The Ju-288 was as fast as a mossie (I think, you real data guys don't scalp me please) and could lift 6K in bombs. 
If you are not GFC...you are wee!
Put on your boots boots boots...and parachutes..chutes...chutes.. .
Illigitimus non carborundum

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #222 on: June 23, 2008, 01:38:29 PM »
How long has it been since Judy got a mention?

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15470
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #223 on: June 30, 2008, 03:42:01 AM »
I'd still go by numbers produced in WWII for the various countries for adding planes, with some ordering based on what would be nice to fill out scenarios.  The list below are the most-produced planes, for each country, that are not already in the game.  I then shuffled and interleaved the order of countries based on a preference for which aircraft are most useful for scenarios.  For example, the Japanese plane set is missing its major bomber (the G4M) and it's best and most-produced torpedo and divebombers (the B6N and the D4Y); and the Russian plane set could use one of its major attack planes (the Pe-2) and more representation for early and mid war (I-16, Yak-1, etc.).

He 111, 7300 -- for Battle of Britain
Pe-2, 11427 -- a major Soviet attack plane, 2nd only to the Il-2
G4M (Betty), 2446 -- the main Japanese bomber
D4Y Suisei (Judy), 2038 -- the most-produced Japanese divebomber (better and faster than the D3A)
B6N Tenzan (Jill), 1268 -- the most-produced Japanese torpedo/carrier bomber (upgrade of the B5N)
I-16, 9004 -- for early-war German/Russian scenarios
Yak-1, 8720 -- for early-war German/Russian scenarios
Ki-43 Hayabusa (Oscar), 5919 -- a much-used Japanse fighter in the earlier years
LaGG-3, 6258 -- for early-war German/Russian scenarios
Ki-21 (Sally), 2064 -- a much-used Japanese bomber
Yak-7, 6339 -- for mid-war German/Russian scenarios


Offline Coolguy0730

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Re: The planes we truly need most.
« Reply #224 on: June 30, 2008, 10:35:39 AM »
More versions of the Me-262
"The mission of the USAF is to fly, fight, an to win... and don't you forget it it!" -General John P. McConnell

System: C343 landed 10256310295789 cheap kills because he can!!!!