Author Topic: what we need is more cool vehicles!  (Read 2660 times)

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #60 on: August 25, 2006, 02:06:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by taylortanklover
u r wrong cause the shermans engine wass a ford 500 horse power it was not of a gm truck i have a book to prove it!


See link below:
Chrysler A57

I was wrong - it was a Chrysler, not a GM 6-cyl motor.  That's not to say they didn't use different engines, it just goes to show that they designed a tank that could be produced quickly by US automakers....

EagleDNY

Offline taylortanklover

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #61 on: August 25, 2006, 02:10:50 PM »
ow, wait u r right for the last part of the war in the begining to 3/4 of the war the sherman got heavier so that means it needs a stronger engine!

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #62 on: August 25, 2006, 05:07:09 PM »
When you read more, you'll see that the M4 series had alot of changes through it's life, to cope with changing conditions on the battlefield. It tried several different Powerpack options(like the A57, The Ford GAA, There was a twin GMC 6-71 diesel used in the M4A2, I believe) and the Armament changed as the war progressed. It went from a L/39 75mm to the long 76mm, as well as the 105mm assault variant. But, up till the end, the predominant variant had the short 75.
 
      If this was what was incorporated in the game, Where you could get taken out with a frontal shot at 1500-2000 yrds., and you would have to close to within 500-750 to kill anything else, It would probably wind up a hangar queen. Remember, AH2 does not take maintenance or range into account, and #'s are determined by whoever wishes to spawn it, so those advantages are negated.                                                              

      Picture this: TT on the Trinity map, you spawn in, you have 8 other M4's there....and you are opposed by at least as many pzIV's, Tigers, T-34's, all superior tanks. You try, and try, and try, but without 30-40 people spawning M4's, you are outclassed. That would be if it is modeled correctly.


     This is why you see people asking for the M-26, With it's thicker armor and 90mm gun, would be an even 1-vs-1 match. Now, I could see some use for the over-turret rockets, or the 105mm Howitzer equipped varriants, would be handy knocking down a field town, or FH's or VH's, It would probably become a favorite in that context. My .02$

     -Frode

Offline Lye-El

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1466
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #63 on: August 25, 2006, 05:26:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by taylortanklover
the abrams runs on jet fuel it has a weird jet engine! and the abrams canburn everyhthing for fuel! Even poop!:D


Turbine, and it doesn't run on sewage. Besides it would plug the fuel filters.


i dont got enough perkies as it is and i like upen my lancs to kill 1 dang t 34 or wirble its fun droping 42 bombs

Offline baron7

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #64 on: August 29, 2006, 12:33:26 PM »
yea a sherman was destroyed after a tiger (it might have been a king tiger im not sure) shot a shell through a building and if you want a new tank get something big like the panzer maus although it was never produces this thing was BIG it had a 128mm cannon its armor was 240mm thick and weighned in at 188 tons! i cant post pics for some reason if i find out how i will post a pic of one

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #65 on: August 29, 2006, 02:18:02 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Meatwad
Heres some BASIC help. Medication is your friend (and english class)

10 Ritalin
20 Spell Check
30 GOTO 10



AAAUUGGHHHHH!!!!

Basic.  Now my brain is bleeding.  Bad Meatwad.  BAD!  :eek:
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline taylortanklover

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #66 on: August 30, 2006, 08:47:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by baron7
yea a sherman was destroyed after a tiger (it might have been a king tiger im not sure) shot a shell through a building and if you want a new tank get something big like the panzer maus although it was never produces this thing was BIG it had a 128mm cannon its armor was 240mm thick and weighned in at 188 tons! i cant post pics for some reason if i find out how i will post a pic of one



in my book it says u r defeanatly not tlking about the king tiger it says the armor of its turret is 180mm (in U.S. 7 in.!1) and it still hade the 88 for a gun! u could be talking about the panzer V Ausf D or G but the armor is close to that of a tiger and the gun is like a gun of a sherman (75mm). that is about it!

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #67 on: August 30, 2006, 09:05:59 PM »
Taylor, since baron is using your exact punctuation style (which is to say, he uses no punctuation) I would have thought you could translate better what he meant.  Let me attempt a more understandable version . . .
Quote
originally posted by baron7, but fixed by E25280:
Yeah, a Sherman was destroyed after a Tiger (it might have been a King Tiger, I'm not sure) shot a shell through a building.

If you want a new tank, get something big like the Panzer Maus.  Although it was never produced, this thing was BIG!  It had a 128mm cannon, its armor was 240mm thick, and weighed in at 188 tons! I can't post pics for some reason - if I find out how, I will post a pic of one.


Better?  He is NOT referring to the Panzer V "Panther", but the Panzer VIII "Maus."  Try this site:

http://www.achtungpanzer.com/pz7.htm

And , by the way . . .
Quote
originally posted by taylortanklover:
the panzer V Ausf D or G but the armor is close to that of a tiger and the gun is like a gun of a sherman (75mm).
Aside from both firing a shell 75mm in diameter, there really is no similarity between the Sherman's snub 75mm and the Panther's 75mm KwK 42 L/70 (which was in fact a better AT gun than the Tiger I's 88mm gun).


Now, please -- take a grammar class, both of you!
« Last Edit: August 30, 2006, 09:10:41 PM by E25280 »
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline taylortanklover

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #68 on: August 31, 2006, 07:09:41 AM »
i like the destroyed picture of it!

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #69 on: September 02, 2006, 07:47:30 PM »
Alot of discussions regarding Sherman vs T-34 in this thread, so seemed appropriate to post this link here.  I thought it was an interesting read, from a Russian who used a Lend-Lease Sherman during the war.  Note the comparisons he makes to the Russian tanks -- I found especially interesting the comments about the higher tendency of the T-34 to have secondary ammo explosions vs the Shermans.

Enjoy.

http://www.iremember.ru/tankers/loza/loza1.html
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline taylortanklover

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #70 on: September 03, 2006, 04:08:17 PM »
k what i do not under stand is why is there a picture of a weird guy on it?

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #71 on: September 03, 2006, 04:57:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by taylortanklover
k what i do not under stand is why is there a picture of a weird guy on it?
:rofl :rofl :rofl  You funny!

Perhaps your reading comprehension skills match your typing skills -- that is the Russian tanker who is interviewed for the article.  I don't find him to be particularly weird looking.  

If you have ever heard of Patton's idea for tanker uniforms, in terms of weirdness it beats the picture in the article hands-down.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline taylortanklover

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 554
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #72 on: September 03, 2006, 05:21:45 PM »
well he just has weird bagy pants!

Offline justfreds

  • Parolee
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #73 on: September 04, 2006, 02:14:32 AM »
someone take the keyboard from this retard ^^^^^^^^^^

Offline stephen

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 744
what we need is more cool vehicles!
« Reply #74 on: September 04, 2006, 10:41:54 AM »
M-26, M-18............

the M-26 perked?
and the open topped M-18 unperked?<------sounds about right to me.
Spell checker is for Morrons