Author Topic: New sub-to-air missile - IRAN (Read 897 times)

Bogie603rd · « **Reply #15 on:** August 28, 2006, 03:32:25 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nilsen
The russians have had some systems installed in the sail, but you have to be on the surface or semi-submerged to fire them.

That reminds me, I forgot to mention I heard that the majority of their weapons aresenal is or was created by the russians. Also, the sub has to be surfaced to fire this missile.

Nilsen · « **Reply #16 on:** August 28, 2006, 03:50:51 PM »

Alot of what the Iranians have are made by/designed by/designed with Russia or China.

The Iranian missile that hit the two ships off the Lebanese coast is a Chinese design that has been reverse-engineered from a Russian weapon and improved.

ghi · « **Reply #17 on:** August 28, 2006, 04:12:52 PM »

What about this F-15 launched from sub!? fake? must be a Polaris missile faked, no?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6084166636389127522&q=f+15&hl=en

BlueJ1 · « **Reply #18 on:** August 28, 2006, 04:14:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by ghi
What about this F-15 launched from sub!? fake?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6084166636389127522&q=f+15&hl=en

Yes, very fake. It looks like it was a rockets and someone just put a f-16 over it.

Rino · « **Reply #19 on:** August 28, 2006, 05:51:37 PM »

I wonder how useful a sub would be in the Persian gulf, fairly shallow
water for submarine operations.

Lye-El · « **Reply #20 on:** August 28, 2006, 07:16:57 PM »

Quote

I wonder how useful a sub would be in the Persian gulf, fairly shallow

Great for sinking oil tankers.......

Rino · « **Reply #21 on:** August 28, 2006, 07:20:25 PM »

I suppose so, if they can get to them.

Viking · « **Reply #22 on:** August 28, 2006, 08:41:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nilsen
Alot of what the Iranians have are made by/designed by/designed with Russia or China.

The Iranian missile that hit the two ships off the Lebanese coast is a Chinese design that has been reverse-engineered from a Russian weapon and improved.

Nope. It was an Iranian made copy of a Chinese development of a reverse-enginered French MM.38 Exocet.

Hi Nilsen, I'm Viking, a countryman of yours.

Toad · « **Reply #23 on:** August 28, 2006, 08:55:09 PM »

Quote

Wiki: Persian Gulf

The waters are overall very shallow and have a maximum depth of 90 metres and an average depth of 50 metres.

Wouldn't take very long to crash dive to the bottom, I'd think.

lukster · « **Reply #24 on:** August 28, 2006, 10:09:52 PM »

Anyone ever try this? http://www.strategyfirst.com/en/games/DangerousWaters/

john9001 · « **Reply #25 on:** August 28, 2006, 10:19:48 PM »

USN calls a iranian sub in the Persian gulf a "target".

Nilsen · « **Reply #26 on:** August 29, 2006, 01:11:01 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
Nope. It was an Iranian made copy of a Chinese development of a reverse-enginered French MM.38 Exocet.

Hi Nilsen, I'm Viking, a countryman of yours.

Hi Viking.. I got my missiles mixed up and you are correct. Exocet was the original that was reverse-engineered.

Bogie603rd · « **Reply #27 on:** August 29, 2006, 10:38:27 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by ghi
What about this F-15 launched from sub!? fake? must be a Polaris missile faked, no?

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6084166636389127522&q=f+15&hl=en

(Off topic really quickly) After clicking that link I found another video that I thought would be fun to watch. After watching it 3 times, I noticed one of the bombs being dropped from this A-10 never detonated on impact!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3250497958394185571
Watch the bomb on the far right.

Chairboy · « **Reply #28 on:** August 29, 2006, 10:47:21 AM »

In regards to sub-to-air missiles, it's worth nothing that the US submarine fleet has a handful of Stinger launchers on each ship, if I understand correctly. Not exactly what the subject is about (if by "not exactly" I mean "not at all"), but it's technically, in this context, a sub to air missile.

I don't imagine that a Polaris configured to airburst 30 seconds after launch to knock out local aircraft would count either, for that matter....

Bogie603rd · « **Reply #29 on:** August 29, 2006, 11:05:17 AM »

True, it's nothing big that we can't handle. But once again, it just shows proof that Iran is not planning on ceising all work on its nuclear program. Especially since their coming out with tests for all this technology they are making / receiving. The U.N. (Although their a bunch of asses) should take note of this and decide that isolationism is the only method, if not a full-scale attack with bunker-busters on their nuclear sites.