I was thinking today... Is it really ethical for us to say "we need to stop global warming, or deforestation, or whatever, because all these species are going extinct?"
Why are we supposed to save all the other species? Who are we to say that these species HAVE to remain on the planet now, when countless others have passed on long before we got here?
Global warming, for example, is a catastrophe for certain species, sure. But it's also an opportunity for many others. In much the same way, so is extinction. A catastrophe for the extinct, an opportunity for everything else.
We're just animals, right? Are we so presumptious to believe that we are the only animal to ever completely alter an ecosystem? Or that it is somehow our duty to ensure that the status quo of life forms on this planet at this exact time exists forever? That's not the way things have ever worked. Why is it so incredibly important that we live in a time capsule now?
I mean, don't get me wrong - I don't advocate the ruthless slaughter of endangered species just because they'd make a nice hat... I'm just saying we have to accept that species will go extinct in large part due to changes in their environment that they cannot adapt to. Other species will adapt through evolution and natural selection and such and make it and go on to become new species.
It's how it's always worked, for millions of years before us.
Of course, I like the animals we have here now

I'm not in any hurry to see them depart... But this was something to mull over today and I think it's an interesting thought.