« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: 9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)  (Read 1427 times)

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2006, 12:59:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
P39 and P63 was done by the thousands. P63 would be on top in the MA stuff



Heinkels had whole factories built just to make more of them! ;)
Logged

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2006, 04:39:27 PM »
Wonder if they would reconsider letting a small group of guys produce the basic planes, then they could add their magic to them.

FSDS and GMax can both export in a format Multigen can read.

Been playing with FSDS myself last 3-4 weeks, produced an AI F-117A.



Fully animated gear, fins.
Chute pops out on landing :) .
Warning flags and chocks when inactive.
Animated canopy.

Might help as there isn't supposed to be any new content (from HTC anyway) until after T.O.D. or whatever it's called is released.
Logged
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2006, 05:26:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Noir
P47D5

I made wishlist post for early war arena, look up for it !

P-47D-5 is a Mid War fighter.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2006, 06:09:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ghosth
Yep

For my opinion, put CT on hold, work on giving us a bunch of new planes for 6 months. Then worry about CT again.


I like that idea.:aok
Logged

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2006, 06:10:35 PM »
I wouldn't be surprised if the current F4U-1A isn't relabeled as an F4U-1 and another bubbletop -1A isn't released when they get the F4U series remodeled.  They've been doing a pretty good job fixing things like that when they re-make the aircraft to AHII standards.

There are a boatload of useful variations that would be fairly easy to roll out with new models.
Logged
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2006, 07:06:15 PM »
Ooo, lists.  I can do lists too!

Early War

Germany
Ju-52
Panzer IV D

Italy
S.M.79-II

Japan
G4M2
Ki-43-II-Otsu

Soviet Union
I-16-21
LaGG-3
SB-2
Yak-1

United Kindom
Beaufighter Mk X
Mosquito B.Mk IV
Mosquito F.Mk II
Wellington B.Mk III

United States
B-25C
P-39D
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2006, 07:26:58 PM »
Mosquito T .III?
Logged

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2006, 09:09:24 PM »
USSR needs P-39Q

Heh it's hard to believe that one of the top soviet ace actually flew teh P-39 throughout the whole war
Logged

Offline bkbandit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #23 on: September 18, 2006, 09:40:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kev367th
Wonder if they would reconsider letting a small group of guys produce the basic planes, then they could add their magic to them.

FSDS and GMax can both export in a format Multigen can read.

Been playing with FSDS myself last 3-4 weeks, produced an AI F-117A.



Fully animated gear, fins.
Chute pops out on landing :) .
Warning flags and chocks when inactive.
Animated canopy.

Might help as there isn't supposed to be any new content (from HTC anyway) until after T.O.D. or whatever it's called is released.


THis would help fill the gaps quick, then they can finish ww2 and add KOREA.
Logged

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2006, 11:37:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 1K3
Late war plane sets
Most Late War equipment have been covered in AH.

Japan

B6N (improved B5N series)
D4Y Suisei (Comet, one of the worlds FASTEST dive bombers in history)
J2M Raiden (one of the fastest Navy fighters in japanese inventory)


Wouldn't all three of these fit better in the mid-war planesets?

-Sik

PS: Judy Judy Judy!
Logged
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #25 on: September 20, 2006, 11:13:26 AM »
they're all late war.

Why can't htc be absolute on the dates?  I hear that ki-84 is available in mid war but that plane appeared in LATE '44 (late war!)

I guess it would take an introduction of Ki-44 in mid war arema to move the Ki-84 to late war status.
Logged

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #26 on: September 20, 2006, 12:49:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 1K3
they're all late war.

Why can't htc be absolute on the dates?  I hear that ki-84 is available in mid war but that plane appeared in LATE '44 (late war!)

I guess it would take an introduction of Ki-44 in mid war arema to move the Ki-84 to late war status.


Easisest way would be to just say -

EW - 1940/1
MW - 1942/3
LW - 1944/5

With aircraft in them when they flew at at least squadron strength, no subs, no fudging.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2006, 12:53:12 PM by Kev367th »
Logged
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
9-13 exposed us the gaps in AH planeset(!)
« Reply #27 on: September 20, 2006, 11:20:51 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 1K3
they're all late war.


Though your singular pronouncements are fun, I guess I need to know what you consider "late war."

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but wasn't the J2M  in Service thoughout 1943? The D4Y from Winter '42 on?

The B6N... I think you're right about that one.

-Sik
Logged
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »