Author Topic: Muslims pissed..yet again  (Read 1455 times)

Offline FUNKED1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6866
      • http://soldatensender.blogspot.com/
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2006, 03:16:22 PM »
Muslims kill 3,000 of us, we kill 50,000 of them in retaliation, and they are the ones from the messed up violent culture.  :rolleyes:

Offline Elfie

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6143
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #16 on: September 16, 2006, 03:17:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Muslims kill 3,000 of us, we kill 50,000 of them in retaliation, and they are the ones from the messed up violent culture.  :rolleyes:



A pretty sizable chunk of that 50,000 was Muslims killing Muslims. This was shown in another thread. /shrug
Corkyjr on country jumping:
In the end you should be thankful for those players like us who switch to try and help keep things even because our willingness to do so, helps a more selfish, I want it my way player, get to fly his latewar uber ride.

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #17 on: September 16, 2006, 03:23:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKH
That's a bad example, for a variety of reasons.

 Superpowers like to think they are untouchable. But they should never forget the lesson of Britain's celebrated Boudicca...


The British look at Boudicca as though she was a brilliant leader, and the Germans look at Arminius in the same light.  Both are wrong.

I chose her for the Battle of Watling Street.  Depending on which history you go by, a very small Roman force (read, western, civilized, structured), utterly annihilated a very much larger (how much larger depends on the source) force of Britons.

Of course she had a field day destroying little piece-meal forces, long retired veterans, and women and children before she was defeated, which obviously makes her a great heroin.

Kinda like Arminius.  He decieves, betrays, and ambushes three poorly led Legions who (thought they) were marching to his aid, and he's hailed as a brilliant leader, and a German national hero.  What is never told, is every other battle after that, even battles that started when the Romans were ambushed (albeit in territory they now knew was hostile), and when the Romans were besieged, outnumbered, or depleted, he was crushed.
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline cav58d

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3985
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #18 on: September 16, 2006, 03:54:46 PM »
These people are bringing a world of hurt down on themselves soon and it's going to make the Crusades look like a joke. -  Well said hornet
<S> Lyme

Sick Puppies II

412th Friday Night Volunteer Group

Offline Gh0stFT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1736
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #19 on: September 16, 2006, 05:07:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
That's exactly what the Islamic extremists want; an escalation that leads to a radicalisation of the majority moderate muslims in the defence of their faith. Global conflict is exactly their aim and their only way of gaining power. Oppression breeds resistance.


what to expect from people who explode themself, kill/behead others,
this extremists want Armageddon, the final fight. Thats what they
get teached every day...

Like Dowding said, "Global conflict is exactly their aim and their only way of gaining power."
...and we should not feed this kind of troll.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #20 on: September 16, 2006, 08:24:54 PM »
Hi Uberhun,

Quote
Originally posted by uberhun
I don't know why we even give them the time of day actually. If these people want to be "The faithfull followers of Islam". They need to be able to read their freaking book. The Quran speaks of co existance not Jiad. I mean really WTF?? 70 Virgins totally taken out of context. All this Urban myth B.S. Perpetuated by uninformed and the Media.


Presumably we can assume that Muhammad understood Islam, and that even if we should not necessarily judge a religion by the actions of those who profess to be followers, we can and should judge a religion by the actions and writings of its founder.

If we examine the life of Muhammad we find that he ordered the assasination of those who wrote things against him (Bint Marwan and Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf, etc.) and after the Meccans rejected Islam led the first Jihad in order to impose Islam upon them. In fact, Muhammad told his followers that their prior peace treaties and alliances with the Meccan tribes need not be kept as they were unbelievers (Westerners take note). This Jihad started with raids on Meccan trade caravans and then progressed to the "Battle of Badr" the first Islamic victory an attack ordered by by Muhammad on a large Meccan caravan. This was followed by Muhammad leading the fight against a Medinan Jewish Tribe that refused to accept Islam, the Banu Qaynuqa, they were defeated, their property was divided and they were expelled, later the Jewish Banu Nadir who also refused to convert suffered the same fate, after a later battle all the men of the tribe were killed and their women and property divided by the prophet as spoils. The Prophet also commanded the same fate for the Jewish Banu Qurayza tribe. Their extermination is detailed as follows:

Quote
"Then they surrendered, and the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of d. al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches. Among them was the enemy of Allah Huyayy b. Akhtab and Ka`b b. Asad their chief. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. As they were being taken out in batches to the apostle they asked Ka`b what he thought would be done with them. He replied, 'Will you never understand? Don't you see that the summoner never stops and those who are taken away do not return? By Allah it is death!' This went on until the apostle made an end of them. Huyayy was brought out wearing a flowered robe in which he had made holes about the size of the finger-tips in every part so that it should not be taken from him as spoil, with his hands bound to his neck by a rope. When he saw the apostle he said, 'By God, I do not blame myself for opposing you, but he who forsakes God will be forsaken.' Then he went to the men and said, 'God's command is right. A book and a decree, and massacre have been written against the Sons of Israel.' Then he sat down and his head was struck off." (HADITH: IBN ISHAQ)


That evening Muhammad took the widow of the man he killed, Safiyya bint Huyayy, as wife, which was no doubt quite a wedding night for her.

In any event later Muhammad sent the first Jihad expedition against the Byzantines, convinced that Allah would give Islam an early victory over the Christians. This was not to be and the force was defeated at Mu'tah. [Several years after his death, Jihadis would win a series of great victories over the Byzantines eventually taking over most of the Empire's Eastern dominions. In time, the vision of Muhammad would be realized with the Byzantine's final defeat at the fall of Constantinoplel to the Ottoman Sultan (who styled himself Caliph, defender of Islam and the Holy Places) in the 15th century.]

In 630 AD Muhammad lead the final attack on Mecca which captured the city, this was followed by a successful Jihad campaign against the Arab Christian Ghassanids which effectively left the Arabian Peninsula entirely Islamic by the time of Muhammad's death.

Now why did I spend all this time rehearsing the life of Muhammad?

1) Because while I could have shown that violent Jihad for the spread of Islam is a duty taught in the Quran and Hadiths, inevitably Westerners would attempt to say "that's your interpretation" and dismiss any number of quotes.

2) Therefore, I chose to simply show the fact that the first violent Jihads were ordered and lead by Muhammad, the founder of Islam. If Jihad is not a duty taught in the Quran, then it's author didn't understand or practice the religion he created, which is simply absurd.


Let us face it, Islam always has been and is supposed to be, spread by the Sword. We may not like the Jihadis, we may prefer liberal revisions of Islam, but let's not pretend that the Jihadis don't consistently understand the fundamentals of Islam and practice Jihad in a manner that follows the example of Muhammad. When we do that, we are telling lies about them and lets leave the "dissimulating" to them.
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #21 on: September 16, 2006, 10:24:17 PM »
Seagoon,

I'm not doubting you here, but can you provide me with some starter sources so I can do my own research?

It's just that if I'm going to make the same argument you just did, I can't very well say "this guy I know on an internet BBS told me so" as my source :)

I'd like to get some education on the matter.  Any books or journals you can recommend would be appreciated.

Thanks,
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #22 on: September 16, 2006, 11:46:21 PM »
Hi Vudak,

A lot of the events and details can be harvested from the Wikipedia entries on Muhammad. In fact, I used Wikipedia as a convenient way of getting at a translation of the Hadith quote from the Banu Qurayza massacre. Incidently watch out for variant spellings in any translation from the Arabic, especially when searching online. Banu for instance is sometimes Bene, Quran is often Koran, etc.

In terms of Scholarly works, if you don't have time to glean through a straight history like Watt's excellent Muhammad - Prophet and Statesman or Paul Fregosi's Jihad in the West and simply connect the historical dots, and are just looking for the straight bad news about the prophet, the man to read is probably going to be Robert Spencer, who in addition to several prior works including Islam Unveiled has just written a new "please declare a fatwa against me" contribution - "The Truth About Muhammad" which comes out on October 9th. You can already reserve a copy on Amazon.

Now I'll admit, I didn't start with guys like Spencer, I started reading either translations of Muslim material or histories like Lewis' "Islam - From the Prophet Muhammad to the Capture of Constantinople" and so on, and that has given me a better vantage point (I hope) from which to assess the historicity of Spencer. It also caused me to scratch my head when I began to hear that Islam was a "peaceful religion" in the 1990s. Even when I was enamored of Islam in late 80s, I considered it a "power religion".

Anyway hope that helps.

Off to bed I go...
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #23 on: September 16, 2006, 11:59:07 PM »
Many thanks, Seagoon :)
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline Seagoon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2396
      • http://www.providencepca.com
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #24 on: September 17, 2006, 12:08:01 AM »
Vudak,

One last thought, I even got out of bed to type this. As you study Islam, beware the two most common errors committed by Westerners at present (aside from not bothering to study at all) which is to:

1) View Islam using the same template one uses for other mostly spiritual "religions" - Islam is a comprehensive ideology, in order to get it right think of it as a comprehensive social and political system with an attendent religion. Not a religion that missteps when it ventures into politics.

2) Do not attempt to assess Islam via anecdotal evidence of Westerners who have had good interactions with Westernized/Liberal Muslims. This would be like attempting to assess a White Supremacist movement via a good experience you had singing bluegrass tunes round a campfire with a couple of the members of the movement, or attempting to assess Nazism via the nice conversations you've had about gardening with the wife of a National Socialist, or even judging Christianity by the actions of someone Baptized Christian and calling himself Christian who admits he doesn't know anything about the Bible or consistently practice its teachings. Study the Founder, the actual history, the original teachings and what happens when the system is applied most consistently to a society.
SEAGOON aka Pastor Andy Webb
"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." - John Adams

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #25 on: September 17, 2006, 12:14:54 AM »
Thanks again, Seagoon...

I actually just ordered Fergosi, Watts, and the new Spencer book that's coming out...

I realize you're going to bed and probably won't see this until tomorrow...  But your earlier choice of wording regarding Spencer, "historicity..."  Does this mean you don't find him, eh, scholarly or professional?  Or would you just not have believed him if you hadn't read the other works first/had them to cross reference?

I guess I'm just trying to get at - do his claims add up after some investigation/prior knowledge or does he take some significant liberties?
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline AKH

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #26 on: September 17, 2006, 01:21:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Vudak
The British look at Boudicca as though she was a brilliant leader, and the Germans look at Arminius in the same light.  Both are wrong.

I chose her for the Battle of Watling Street.  Depending on which history you go by, a very small Roman force (read, western, civilized, structured), utterly annihilated a very much larger (how much larger depends on the source) force of Britons.

Of course she had a field day destroying little piece-meal forces, long retired veterans, and women and children before she was defeated, which obviously makes her a great heroin.


It's plain enough that you have little idea of how the British do see Boudicca.

Oh, the toils of the empire, struggling to bring civilisation, order and culture to its dominions.  What a romantic view of the Roman Empire you seem to have:  western, civilised, structured = good guys in white hats?

Anyway, back to why it's a bad example - what happened to the Roman Empire?  

This will get you started
AKHoopy Arabian Knights
google koan: "Your assumptions about the lives of others are in direct relation to your naïve pomposity."

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #27 on: September 17, 2006, 01:22:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Flatbar
Unfortunately, Islam hasn't cornered the market on religious wackos, per capita they may have more but let's not forget those religious wackos here in our own country who justify killing doctors and firebombing clinics who do things that are in opposition to their skewed religious beliefs.

Remember the Rajneeshie's and their attempt at poisioning whole community?


Dayum Flatbar!  Thank you so much!

I was unsure what to think about this whole Islam thingy but you my friend have put it all into perspective for me! :aok

Let's not forget those religious wackos here in our country...their behavior makes the whole Islam thingy ok in my book!  Tit for Tat.

Offline Vudak

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4819
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #28 on: September 17, 2006, 01:31:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKH
It's plain enough that you have little idea of how the British do see Boudicca.

Oh, the toils of the empire, struggling to bring civilisation, order and culture to its dominions.  What a romantic view of the Roman Empire you seem to have:  western, civilised, structured = good guys in white hats?

Anyway, back to why it's a bad example - what happened to the Roman Empire?  

This will get you started


Of course, Boudicca was, what, four centuries before the fall of the West Roman Empire, give or take a few decades?

I guess I don't have a good clue as to how the British view Boudicca, or how the Germans view Arminius.  I'm going on how your views are represented over here...  This could be wrong (care to enlighten me though?)

And as for the whole "Romantic View", I'm speaking solely on the battlefield...  The Romans, at the time of Boudicca, were certainly western, civilized, structured as compared to the Britons who were, essentially, a mess.  The end result?  Complete slaughter of the Britons at Watling Street.

I see a parallel in armies of the western world and "armies" of the middle east today.  I'm not trying to get into a societal debate here ;)

- Edit - and comparing a Legion (or really many other aspects of Rome) of the early Principate to a Legion around the time the west fell is, well, silly.
« Last Edit: September 17, 2006, 01:34:13 AM by Vudak »
Vudak
352nd Fighter Group

Offline fd ski

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1530
      • http://www.northotwing.com/wing/
Muslims pissed..yet again
« Reply #29 on: September 17, 2006, 02:04:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FUNKED1
Muslims kill 3,000 of us, we kill 50,000 of them in retaliation, and they are the ones from the messed up violent culture.  :rolleyes:


It's a question of effectiveness :)