Very Concerned

[straffo]

Originally posted by Mini D
You seem to have ignored definition 1, 2 and 4.

I guess you liked that one best?

Well not it's the one I find correct the other are like the definition 2 and 3 of Nitrofish

[dmf]

Originally posted by Neubob
God is an indifferent salamander, as would anyone be standing over an ant hill that he regularly floods with water and zaps with a magnifying glass. In all likely hood, god's too busy banging Mrs. God to make personal time for individual ants.

I would possibly believe that if you can prove to me there's a god in the first place. And if you can prove theres a god, can you prove that god is not just as corrupt as our govt?

[Neubob]

Originally posted by dmf
I would possibly believe that if you can prove to me there's a god in the first place. And if you can prove theres a god, can you prove that god is not just as corrupt as our govt?

Well, DMF, the best I can do is to say that if he, she or it does exist, he she or it certainly isn't wasting his, her or its time worrying too much about us. Whether it's an omnipotent consciousness, an super-intricate system of organization, an old man with a beard, an overgorwn child with an elaborate erector set, or the black cat that lives next door to me, I really doubt that it is petty enough to sink to our definitions of care, morality or corruption. Our government is not god's work... it's our's.

[rpm]

Originally posted by dmf
I would possibly believe that if you can prove to me there's a god in the first place. And if you can prove theres a god, can you prove that god is not just as corrupt as our govt?

While I can't prove there's a God, I firmly believe God is not corrupt. I mean it's God for Christ's sake! What ever God wants, God pretty much gets. (It's good to be da King!)

What are you gonna bribe God with that God doesn't already have? It's worse than buying your rich uncle a birthday present. They already have everything that cool and anything you can come up with looks lame.

As far as God and Government, that's like drinking and driving.

[Edbert]

Originally posted by dmf
Step 1, Fire congress and the senate, replace all members of both houses ( democrat and republican) with common working class people that don't have millions of dollars.

How do you propose to fire those who have bought off ~50% of the population through some sort of periodic government check ("paychecks" included in that figure)? Particularly when another 50% of American voters know the final 16 contestants on American Idol but cannot name their congressmen.

[storch]

Originally posted by Edbert
How do you propose to fire those who have bought off ~50% of the population through some sort of periodic government check ("paychecks" included in that figure)? Particularly when another 50% of American voters know the final 16 contestants on American Idol but cannot name their congressmen.

hey you, quit asking annoying questions otherwise you may be branded as a malcontent and find yourself reported to homeland security.  

[Mini D]

Originally posted by straffo
Well not it's the one I find correct the other are like the definition 2 and 3 of Nitrofish

Odd, because I've never met an "anarchist" that was for any kind of democracy or cared what the majority thought. You seem to be attempting to idealize the belief and ignoring the reality of it.

[Thrawn]

Originally posted by ByeBye
"Hallibuton and ratheon"  LOL!

Meanwhile, the US economy is more vibrant that ever. Low unemployment, low taxes, low inflation, low gas prices, booming housing market, booming stock market,

All funded by trillions of dollars of debt, that makes it a very unhealthy economy.

[Edbert]

Originally posted by Thrawn
All funded by trillions of dollars of debt, that makes it a very unhealthy economy.

I'd love to see the debt reduced/eliminated/outlawed, don't get me wrong, but total debt viewed per-capita or as a percentage of gross revenue is not out of line with, and better than some other G8 nations.