Author Topic: An interesting article on "could have been"  (Read 988 times)

Offline Gunthr

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3043
      • http://www.dot.squat
An interesting article on "could have been"
« Reply #15 on: November 17, 2001, 06:53:00 AM »
Yes, you are biased.  :)

Bush is not an Orator. He does speak very directly, however. Some American press made the Churchillian reference... not me.

Bush most certainly did change words into unassailable truth. The Taliban believe his words, even if you don't.


 
Quote
As for Britain standing with you? Some say we might be holding you back. I was surprised the US waited as long as it did before hitting Afghanistan.

I wasn't. Same tactics as Desert Storm. I'm hardly qualified to judge US tactics in Afganistan without access to all the military intelligence, but success does kind of speak for itself.
"When I speak I put on a mask. When I act, I am forced to take it off."  - Helvetius 18th Century

Offline texter

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 123
An interesting article on "could have been"
« Reply #16 on: November 17, 2001, 08:11:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by miko2d:
I think Economist would not be either and that is the tone of their article.
 miko

Short bus?

Tex