Author Topic: Vote (Read 2044 times)

Widewing · « **Reply #45 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:04:41 PM »

More options are always better.... We now have two additional options.

I personally prefer the mid war arena..., but still enjoy both early and late.

My regards,

Widewing

hubsonfire · « **Reply #46 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:07:52 PM »

Yes or No, people. It ain't rocket science.

Arlo · « **Reply #47 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:24:54 PM »

Ok. In that case ... yes or no.

MOIL · « **Reply #48 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:41:41 PM »

One in every group isn't there:lol

Arlo · « **Reply #49 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:46:04 PM »

Hiyas. MOIL. Shermie, baybee.

MINNOW · « **Reply #50 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:57:27 PM »

Simaril · « **Reply #51 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:58:12 PM »

Widewing · « **Reply #52 on:** October 03, 2006, 12:33:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by hubsonfire
Yes or No, people. It ain't rocket science.

His original question was not written within the context of a yes or no answer.

IE: Which do you like better; baseball or football, yes or no?

As opposed to; do you like baseball better than football, yes or no?

Within the correct context, I'd say yes.

My regards,

Widewing

hubsonfire · « **Reply #53 on:** October 03, 2006, 01:26:29 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Widewing
His original question blah blah blah. Factoid, blah blah. Accurate observation blah blah blah.
My regards,

Widewing

But he asked for Yes' and/or Nos.

You're physically incapable of responding in a manner that's not entirely factual, aren't you? Can I not have any fun at all around here?

[size=0]Those are both yes/no questions, without room for commentary or qualifying remarks. Thank you. [/size]

and I forgot again- I vote yes, assuming he meant to phrase the question in the same manner in which I interpreted it.

TexMurphy · « **Reply #54 on:** October 03, 2006, 01:29:25 AM »

Ghosth · « **Reply #55 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:18:50 AM »

I don't get it. The LWA has virtually everything just the way the old main was.
So wny are people still upset? Because a few of us actually prefer having more choices than that? The only real difference left is that the arena is capped at 350. No more 700 player hordes, and IMO thats not a bad thing.

How many of you have noticed that there is actually less lagg with only 250 - 350 in the arena compared to the old 650 - 750?

AH has a LONG LONG history of sweeping changes taking place with NO notice.
Its root hog, learn to adapt, or die, survival of the fittest. And if you can't cut it, well too bad. If you don't like it same deal. This is HT's sandbox and we play here as his guests. Yes we pay for the priviledge, but those priviledges can be revoked at any time. He owns the sandbox, he makes the ground rules, we follow them. Its as simple as that.

WilldCrd · « **Reply #56 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:20:41 AM »

YES!!

However, I feel there are certain issues that need to be addressed. namely the limit of players in a arena. I know I know HT is already working on that and several other tweeks so I wont put in a laundry list.
Mainly i just wanted to point out that the game and the community are a very dynamic things and cant be veiwed in just black and white or a simple yes or no.

The ppl who dont like the change need to understand also that change is enevitable, sometimes painful but it will have to change from time to time. It has in the past and it will in the future.

ajax501 · « **Reply #57 on:** October 03, 2006, 11:46:06 AM »

Max · « **Reply #58 on:** October 03, 2006, 11:52:22 AM »

Can I vote again?

My chad seems to be dangling.

NoBaddy · « **Reply #59 on:** October 03, 2006, 11:53:05 AM »

Maybe....