Originally posted by Soulyss
Personally I'd hold off on the whole 1080P thing for now. There is currently very little content available @ that resolution, and on a 30-40" screen no one can see the difference between a 1080i and a 1080p picture.
1. Everything is fantastic on my display @ 1080p. I can't compare it to lower resolutions because it upconverts all sources and accepts 1080p via HDMI. I have been running my PC @ 1920x1080p for 16 months and it is awesome.
2. You may be right about the smaller screens @ 1080p.
3. My 1080p 981HD Oppp DVD player looks slightly better than my 971HD did @ 720p and 1080i on my 58" screen.
Originally posted by Soulyss
Not to mention if you run 1080p you have to run a digital signal, IE no component video allowed. The digital cables like HDMI are a half baked idea currently, I've seen better picture out of a analogue "lower resolution" signal many times.
1. HDMI/HDCP isn't going away anytime soon.
2. I can't say I have ever seen a "better" picture from analog than digital but my SA 8300HD DVR is just as good @ 1080i via component as HDMI. I wouldn't waste my time connecting any analog input other than component or VGA.
Originally posted by Soulyss
In general plasma looks better than LCD, I think color representation is more accurate and it has MUCH better black levels. However for a computer monitor I would probably go with LCD as it has less concern with burn in.
1. Mostly agree and the black levels in LCD are getting better.
2. DLP is fading away but my color accuracy and black levels are as good as any plasma I have seen and no burn-in issues.