« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: These New Arenas  (Read 1787 times)

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
These New Arenas
« Reply #30 on: November 01, 2006, 05:14:47 PM »
I wish everyone who hated these changes would PM me an email addy...
Logged
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline CAV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 714
These New Arenas
« Reply #31 on: November 02, 2006, 09:54:12 AM »
Quote
SEA still has 500 players caps, and "Europe" maps are built already  I would like to see a massive more realistic AvA war for us, toolsheders, containing west/east front in SEA, 1945, bombing campaigns, going on like MA, until one team lose the war,


Some of the best maps and plane match-ups are in AvA....

Its just never more than a hand full playing there. I would love to see some the numbers in the MA's start moving to AvA.

CAVALRY
Logged
"THE BATTLE Of BRITIAN" Scenario - RAF 41 Squadron

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
These New Arenas
« Reply #32 on: November 02, 2006, 10:02:51 AM »
yeah cav, i wish both LW arenas would empty into the SE or AVA arena just to have a "Pseudo MA" with larger numbers.
Logged
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
These New Arenas
« Reply #33 on: November 02, 2006, 12:09:50 PM »
Well here's a new thread topic, and what a refreshing point of view at that.
Logged
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
These New Arenas
« Reply #34 on: November 02, 2006, 12:27:38 PM »

TimeStamp         Orange Blue
11/2/2006 12:24:02 AM 74 106
11/2/2006 12:54:02 AM 66 105
11/2/2006 1:24:02 AM 118 12
11/2/2006 1:54:02 AM 104 8
11/2/2006 2:24:02 AM 90 6
11/2/2006 2:54:02 AM 89 9
11/2/2006 3:24:02 AM 79 7
11/2/2006 3:54:02 AM 78 7
11/2/2006 4:24:02 AM 80 8
11/2/2006 4:54:02 AM 75 8
11/2/2006 5:24:02 AM 76 6
11/2/2006 5:54:02 AM 78 8
11/2/2006 6:24:02 AM 83 6
11/2/2006 6:54:02 AM 75 8
11/2/2006 7:24:02 AM 92 9
11/2/2006 7:54:02 AM 109 11
11/2/2006 8:24:02 AM 110 10
11/2/2006 8:54:02 AM 108 12
11/2/2006 9:24:04 AM 110 14
11/2/2006 9:54:04 AM 130 14
11/2/2006 10:24:04 AM 148 14
11/2/2006 10:54:04 AM 166 10
11/2/2006 11:24:04 AM 81 23
11/2/2006 11:54:04 AM 116 27

Quote

60-80 players per arena is playyable for land capture types, but still a little low

You really need at minimum 80 players or more in the same arena to make land capture type play truely enjoyable (again remember half these players are still furballing/milk running). During non prime time this is now an imposability to get 80 players in the same arena so you are leaving 50% ( the half that really enjoy the stategic land grab win the war type) of the player base bored as hell if they can only mostly play after hours.


So exatly what is the problem?

And btw am considering closing Blue during non prime time.

HiTech
Logged

Offline Flayed1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1091
These New Arenas
« Reply #35 on: November 02, 2006, 12:59:29 PM »
OHhhhhhh and HT with the SLAP!!!!! LOL  


  HT it's always nice to see stuff like this... For so many seeing is beliving.  and I also agree there dosn't look like much reason to keep blue open at those times. :)
Logged
From the ashes of the old we rise to fly again. Behold The Phoenix Wing!

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
These New Arenas
« Reply #36 on: November 02, 2006, 01:08:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum


What some fail to understand or just choose to ignore is the following:

Rooks: 70
Bish:  50
Knights: 40

It's often 70 Rooks against at least 70 combined.    This has been a trend for over 7 months now.


LOL...... couldnt be further from the truth, i generally only ever fight bish (i can never climb high enough to find rooks).


everyone will see it as there country getting ganged. And anyway, thats why the 3 country setup works..... because most "sain" people will decide to ignore there weaker one, and attack the stronger one. This makes it balance out properly. Hell, me and serenity took like 7 bases from bish last night and no one ever upped on the bish front. It wasnt "fun" but to be honest, if they leave the door open people are going to move in.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2006, 01:17:55 PM by Overlag »
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Hawco

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 650
These New Arenas
« Reply #37 on: November 02, 2006, 01:10:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by CAV
Some of the best maps and plane match-ups are in AvA....

Its just never more than a hand full playing there. I would love to see some the numbers in the MA's start moving to AvA.

CAVALRY

With you a 100% on that one Cav, I used to fly in the AvA 100% but due to low numbers i called it a day, great place to learn how to fly in though, you got great sticks like Storch, Platano, white 13 and kong, N7 to try and handle, you learn real fast or die real fast.
Logged

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
These New Arenas
« Reply #38 on: November 02, 2006, 01:17:16 PM »
Deleted
« Last Edit: November 02, 2006, 01:27:46 PM by hitech »
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
These New Arenas
« Reply #39 on: November 02, 2006, 01:21:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ghi
SEA still has 500 players caps, and "Europe" maps are built already
 I would like to see a massive more realistic AvA war for us, toolsheders, containing west/east front in SEA, 1945, bombing campaigns, going on like MA, until one team lose the war,




id love that too, but it seems many dont :(
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Mojava

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 351
These New Arenas
« Reply #40 on: November 02, 2006, 01:22:57 PM »
Why not just close the blue for good.
Logged

Offline Angry Samoan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1104
Re: These New Arenas
« Reply #41 on: November 02, 2006, 01:55:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by twitchy
Well I've held my tongue long enough, these new arenas BLOW.


twitchy there are many more that feel the same way, problem being there are to many lurkers (as myself) that monitor the BBS hoping things will change.

The numbers in LW prove MA is not dead. I say consolodate LW to 1 arena.
EW 1 arena  MW 1 arena.
Logged

Offline Triumph

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 116
I am not happy.
« Reply #42 on: November 02, 2006, 02:05:15 PM »
Deleted.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2006, 02:32:30 PM by hitech »
Logged
<<<Triumph>>>

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
These New Arenas
« Reply #43 on: November 02, 2006, 02:31:52 PM »
Deleted
« Last Edit: November 02, 2006, 02:36:29 PM by hitech »
Logged
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
These New Arenas
« Reply #44 on: November 02, 2006, 02:33:58 PM »
Triumph: 2 problems with your post, one the #@@##@ type stuff, I would have let that slide, but the bold comment was out of bounds.

Feel free to post your exat same thoughts, but addhear to the bbs rules


HiTech
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »