Originally posted by Golfer
snip
You might be a good shot, but you've got a long way to go to be a good hunter. That's what I'm saying.
Golfer, just a comment - your point might be taken better if it was made in non-judgmental terms.
As to the point in contention....I'm not a good shot, I'm an extremely good shot. I shot NRA Expert (rifle) at age 11. I regularly shot 5X on the indoor range at that age, that was just routine for me (for those of you who don't shoot, we're talking 5 shots at 50 feet from the target, all centered with all 5 making one hole about a quarter of an inch in diameter). I started hunting on my own (well, me and my dog) at age 9. That was well over 40 years ago. I've killed enough game to fill a warehouse, and processed all the meat myself. I'm speaking as the Voice of Experience here.
I'm perfectly capable of making a neck-spine shot out to, say, 200 yards (to keep it within safe limits).
But I would *never* for any reason attempt to do so.
Golfer and Shuckins are right. Just aft of the point of the shoulder joint is the correct aimpoint on a deer, if shooting from abeam. Its my opinion that the only responsible thing to do when shooting anything is take the shot with the widest margin for error, and the highest probability of a "stop" within that margin.
If you aim for the double lung shot on a deer, you are taking a shot that allows you to err several inches in any direction and still be likely to put the deer down within a reasonable distance. Humans do err, even humans who are "good shots".
Its OK to be prideful of your marksmanship skills. But, leave the demonstations for the target range. In the field, shoot to be effective. That means take every advantage, including margin for error.
culero