Author Topic: B-17 People, please  (Read 1331 times)

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
B-17 People, please
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2006, 05:25:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
pointless? it was part of a sentence in which i recommended a book to you


but why did there need to be a insult thrown in?

who is more mature.

A 20-30year old calling people names on a forum, trying to be a internet hardman?

or

A 14 year old with a squeaky voice (not that he has a squeaky voice)?
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
B-17 People, please
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2006, 07:02:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
pointless? it was part of a sentence in which i recommended a book to you


Could the word 'squeaker' not be ommited? What purpose does it serve? Does it answer the question in any way? Does it contribute to the discussion in a positive way? Im seeing all of those as 'No' answers, so, it seems pretty damned pointless to me... :aok

(btw: thanks for the assist overlag)

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
B-17 People, please
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2006, 11:56:01 PM »
would you prefer helium tank chipmunk?

At least when i was just starting out in AW (at age 11!) we didn't have vox so i didn't have to live with the squeaky, chipmunk, helium, dog whistle and bat sonar jokes.

I guess i'll color myself lucky.  oh...


Lighten up, Francis!

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
B-17 People, please
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2006, 01:03:49 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
who is more mature.

A 20-30year old calling people names on a forum, trying to be a internet hardman?

or

A 14 year old with a squeaky voice (not that he has a squeaky voice)?


i never claimed to be mature, or said to reynolds that he is immature.

nor am i a 20-30 year old trying to be an internet hardman.

Quote
Originally posted by Reynolds
Could the word 'squeaker' not be ommited? What purpose does it serve? Does it answer the question in any way? Does it contribute to the discussion in a positive way? Im seeing all of those as 'No' answers, so, it seems pretty damned pointless to me... :aok

(btw: thanks for the assist overlag)


Yes it does, because it keeps bumping your thread to the top when you reply crying about it.

And sorry i did not realise you were so offended by the word squeaker, i was just messing about - it is a term i use for most of the young people in AH, i will omit that word in future and find a suitable alternative.  Why be serious all of the time?

Offline Stoney74

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
B-17 People, please
« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2006, 01:04:43 AM »
www.398th.org/Research/Formations/Formations_Description.html

Try this link.  Also, you can back out to the home page and take a look at the whole website.  There's a lot of information here.

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
B-17 People, please
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2006, 01:27:28 AM »
Thank you so much stoney!

Offline OntosMk1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 465
B-17 People, please
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2006, 04:54:45 PM »
Quote
this is a great book if you are interested in the 8th AF campaign, squeaker: -


"Squeaker?!?!" that fluff'n Halarious...
BWaahahahahAHahAHAHahAHahahah ahah....
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok :t

on a side note, I really miss flyin dang it :cry
« Last Edit: November 30, 2006, 05:01:54 PM by OntosMk1 »
TIGER, tiger, burning bright  
In the forests of the night,  
What immortal hand or eye  
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
B-17 People, please
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2006, 10:40:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by OntosMk1
"Squeaker?!?!" that fluff'n Halarious...
BWaahahahahAHahAHAHahAHahahah ahah....
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok :t

on a side note, I really miss flyin dang it :cry


Wow, assuming that ISNT sarcasm, that is the dumbest thing I have seen all day. (Keep in mind I had a democracy class in a drug-ridden public school today, so I have seen a LOT of dumb stuff...)

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
B-17 People, please
« Reply #23 on: December 01, 2006, 02:35:40 PM »

Offline Overlag

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3888
B-17 People, please
« Reply #24 on: December 01, 2006, 03:13:03 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Reynolds
(Keep in mind I had a democracy class in a drug-ridden public school today, so I have seen a LOT of dumb stuff...)


they teach you democracy?

thats almost as bad as European Leaders wanting us to teach UK kids how cool Europe is as a superpower and what they have done for the world......ermmmmm yeah whatever......no thanks.
Adam Webb - 71st (Eagle) Squadron RAF Wing B
This post has a Krusty rating of 37

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
B-17 People, please
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2006, 12:49:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Overlag
they teach you democracy?

thats almost as bad as European Leaders wanting us to teach UK kids how cool Europe is as a superpower and what they have done for the world......ermmmmm yeah whatever......no thanks.


We have to take hawaiian studies for 10 years straight. We have to be taught the languages, traditions, everything, but heres the kicker... NO ONE HAS USED THIS CRAP FOR OVER 100 YEARS!!! They want us to speak a language that is 100 times more dead than Latin! Latin at least spawned other languages, and is therefore very useful, but Hawaiian? No one speaks it, no one cares!