Originally posted by Masherbrum
Ok, let me spell it out for you. My post highlighted that "Rankings meant NOTHING before the BCS or even today".
I was not discussing hypothetical situations from years gone by. We are discussing who will play in the upcoming BCS championship game. In that context -- today -- obviously BCS rankings mean everything. This is because the game will be played by (A) the team that has the #1 BCS ranking (which is OSU) and (B) the team that has the #2 BCS ranking at the end of the season (which isn't decided yet).
In fact, I just read the following a minute ago (from
http://www.bcsfootball.org/cfb/story/6188418 ), so what I was talking about originally is actually still on track to happen.
"Michigan remains No. 2 in latest BCS
FOXSports.com
2 minutes ago
What sort of effect would Saturday's "Game of the Century" have on the latest BCS standings?
How about none?
For weeks, many have debated over whether or not there could be a rematch of this Big Ten rivalry in the BCS National Championship Game on Jan. 8, 2007. Ohio State may have defeated Michigan 42-39 in Columbus on Saturday in the biggest game of the season, but the one-loss Wolverines remain at No. 2 in the BCS.
The top five in this week's BCS standings looks just like last week's.
Ohio State remains No. 1, with Michigan at No. 2. USC, Florida and Notre Dame round out the top five, with Arkansas jumping a spot to No. 6 after Rutgers' stunning loss in Cincinnati."