Author Topic: polonium-210  (Read 407 times)

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
polonium-210
« on: November 24, 2006, 11:18:20 PM »
Quote
"You may succeed in silencing me but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed"


Quote
Litvinenko had worked for the KGB and then the Federal Security Service until he publicly accused his superiors in 1998 of ordering him to kill Russian tycoon Boris Berezovsky. He spent nine months in jail on charges of abuse of office, but was later acquitted and moved to Britain.


Intruiging story. Obviously I think Putin could've easily prevented the killing, but I don't fault him for not breaking protocol. I find Litvinenko's reasons for leaving the security service suspect. The skeptic in me says he was, or planned to be, paid nicely from Berezovsky.

What does bother me is that this story gets so much more press than the stories of so many journalists murdered in russia in the last few years.

Oh and why polonium-210? At least with ricin they could pass it off on bulgaria or some other state.

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
polonium-210
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2006, 11:27:27 PM »
The press here is giving it about as much press as other assassinations, including the one he was investigating.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10169
polonium-210
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2006, 11:37:56 PM »
russians killing other russians over political motives, some things will never change :rolleyes:
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Debonair

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
polonium-210
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2006, 12:24:27 AM »
in russia, rat poisons YOU!!!:eek: :O :O :O :O :D :D :D :rofl :rofl

Offline Flatbar

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
Re: polonium-210
« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2006, 03:28:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Suave


Oh and why polonium-210?


Any old photographers/lab techs recall this substance?

IIRC, it was impregnated on that strip of metal under the grate on those anti static neg brushes.

Guess so:

http://www.2spi.com/catalog/photo/statmaster.shtml

Some additional words about safety:
We must not lose sight of the fact that Po210 is highly toxic, emits alpha particles and is regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). Fortunately, the matrix in which it is encased, renders probability of exposure extremely small unless the matrix is damaged by abration or grinding so as to generate dust particles that may be inhaled.

Looks like just about anybody can get hold of small amounts of this stuff.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
polonium-210
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2006, 04:49:46 AM »
So why Polonium instead of Risin?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
polonium-210
« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2006, 10:00:38 AM »
He was also a recent convert to the "religion of peace"

Offline ByeBye

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 599
Re: Re: polonium-210
« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2006, 11:02:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Flatbar
Looks like just about anybody can get hold of small amounts of this stuff.


Yeah, maybe that's why it was used. Anybody could have gotton it, but how many had a motive to kill this guy, and out of those people, how many would have chosen it?