Author Topic: Boston Legal Jumps My Shark  (Read 350 times)

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« on: December 11, 2006, 04:28:26 PM »
I have not been a major watcher of Boston Legal, though what I have seen I have generally enjoyed. It takes a lot for me to become any kind of regular with any TV show (2.5 men and BSG being two recent exceptions). I did decide to watch the show last week that featured the white supremacist girl singers, whose aunt was trying to force them away from their parents for preaching hate.

Now, I agreed with the Constitutional arguments that were made to keep them with their parents. A no brainer, really. But...

WTF was with their "oppose illegal immigrants = racist" theme! At several points it was noted that these girls were "singing at an immigration rally..." and such, strongly stating that if you disagree with illegals than you better dust off the pillowcase.

I understand the misuse of the race card in this issue for PR purposes by those impacted, and the likely social attitudes of show folk in general, but that ****ing show just called me a racist because I believe in secure borders, jobs for AMERICANS of any race at a fair market value for the labor and not allowing companies to pass off their healthcare and labor support (child education, etc.) costs to American taxpayers not connected to their enterprise.

I think I'll write them and suggest a plotline where struggling African American father Bob can't get more than a minimum wage job with no benefits at the local poultry factory because they use illegal labor at sub-market cost and so he has to sue to get the spirit of the laws on the books enforced regarding immigration.

Just pissed me off no end.

Charon
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 04:49:01 PM by Charon »

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2006, 04:44:21 PM »
That show is one continuous shark jump.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2006, 05:39:30 PM »
I LOVE the show, but since Candice Bergen came on...the leftward drift keeps insulting me for not being a liberal--(I get insulted enough around my house with the tv OFF:rofl ) cant watch it anymore...simply can't escape this crap.  I hate soapboxes, which was the downfall of Designing Women, an otherwise VERY good show
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2006, 05:43:09 PM »
Shhhhhh, let's give the liberals just a bit more rope.

Offline midnight Target

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15114
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2006, 06:13:11 PM »
c'mon.. it took you guys 12 years of rope to hang the country.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2006, 06:18:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
c'mon.. it took you guys 12 years of rope to hang the country.


You might want to look at your stock portfolio...;) (Assuming you have one...:confused: )

Incidently, I don't consider too many of these programs as "rope":

The Fiscal Responsibility Act
An amendment to the Constitution that would require a balanced budget, unless sanctioned by a 3/5 vote in both houses of Congress (H.J.Res.1, passed by the US House Roll Call: 300-132, 1/26/95; rejected by the US Senate Roll Call: 64-35, 3/2/95, two-thirds required), and provide the president with a line-item veto (H.R.2, passed by the US House Roll Call: 294-134, 2/6/95; conferenced with S. 4 and enacted with substantial changes 4/9/96 [2]).


The Taking Back Our Streets Act
An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in-sentencing, "good faith" exclusionary rule exemptions (H.R.666 Exclusionary Rule Reform Act, passed US House Roll Call 289-142 2/8/95), death penalty provisions (H.R.729 Effective Death Penalty Act, passed US House Roll Call 297-132 2/8/95; similar provisions enacted under S. 735 [3], 4/24/96), funding prison construction (H.R.667 Violent Criminal Incarceration Act, passed US House Roll Call 265-156 2/10/95, rc#117) and additional law enforcement (H.R.728 Local Government Law Enforcement Block Grants Act, passed US House Roll Call 238-192 2/14/95).


The Personal Responsibility Act
An act to cut spending for welfare programs by means of discouraging illegitimacy and teen pregnancy. This would be achieved by prohibiting welfare to mothers under 18 years of age, denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, and enacting a two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility. H.R.4, the Family Self-Sufficiency Act, included provisions giving food vouchers to unwed mothers under 18 in lieu of cash AFDC benefits, denying cash AFDC benefits for additional children to people on AFDC, requiring recipients to participate in work programs after 2 years on AFDC, complete termination of AFDC payments after five years, and suspending driver and professional licenses of people who fail to pay child support. H.R.4, passed by the US House 234-199, 3/23/95, and passed by the US Senate 87-12, 9/19/95. The Act was vetoed by President Clinton, but the alternative Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act was enacted 8/22/96.


The American Dream Restoration Act
An act to create a $500-per-child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle-class tax relief. H.R.1215, passed 246-188, 4/5/95.


The National Security Restoration Act
An act to prevent U.S. troops from serving under United Nations command unless the president determines it is necessity for the purposes of national security, to cut US payments for UN peacekeeping operations, and to help establish guidelines for the voluntary integration of former Warsaw Pact nations into NATO. H.R.7, passed 241-181, 2/16/95.


 The "Common Sense" Legal Reform Act
An act to institute "Loser pays" laws (H.R.988, passed 232-193, 3/7/95), limits on punitive damages and reform of product-liability laws to prevent what the bill considered frivolous litigation (H.R.956, passed 265-161, 3/10/95; passed Senate 61-37, 5/11/95, vetoed by President Clinton [4]). Another tort reform bill, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was enacted in 1995 when Congress overrode a veto by Clinton.


The Job Creation and Wage Enhancement Act
A package of measures to act as small-business incentives; capital-gains cuts and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages. Although this was listed as a single bill in the Contract, its provisions ultimately made it to the House Floor as four bills:

H.R.5, requiring federal funding for state spending mandated by Congressional action, and estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to cost more than $50m per year, was passed 360-74, 2/1/95. This bill was conferenced with S. 1 and enacted, 3/22/95[5].
H.R.450 required a moratorium on the implementation of Federal regulations until June 30, 1995, and was passed 276-146, 2/24/95. Companion Senate bill S. 219 passed by voice vote, 5/17/05, but the two bills never emerged from conference[6].
H.R.925 required Federal compensation to be paid to property owners when Federal Government actions reduced the value of the property by 20% or more, and was passed 277-148, 3/3/95.
H.R.926, passed 415-14 on 3/1/95, required Federal agencies to provide a cost-benefit analysis on any regulation costing $50m or more annually, to be signed off on by the Office of Management and Budget, and permitted small businesses to sue that agency if they believed the aforementioned analysis was performed inadequately or incorrectly.

The Citizen Legislature Act
An amendment to the Constitution that would have imposed 12-year term limits on members of the US Congress (i.e. six terms for Representatives, two terms for Senators). H.J.Res.73[7] rejected by the US House 227-204 (a constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds majority, not a simple majority), 3/29/95; RC #277.



Other sections of the Contract include a proposed Family Reinforcement Act (tax incentives for adoption, strengthening the powers of parents in their children's education, stronger child pornography laws, and elderly dependent care tax credit) and the Senior Citizens Fairness Act (raise the Social Security earnings limit, repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security benefits and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance).
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 06:22:44 PM by Ripsnort »

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2006, 06:21:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bj229r
I hate soapboxes, which was the downfall of Designing Women


That is for dang sure.
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2006, 06:22:00 PM »
Shatner is the ****.

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2006, 06:22:58 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: December 12, 2006, 10:21:54 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Boston Legal Jumps My Shark
« Reply #9 on: December 12, 2006, 10:00:21 AM »
See Rule #6
« Last Edit: December 12, 2006, 10:22:05 AM by Skuzzy »
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"