Author Topic: Side balancing idea number XXIXVII  (Read 445 times)

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« on: December 27, 2006, 04:03:36 AM »
How about using the % of players on each country in a new way?


First you up the accuracy of field ack, range of radars on bases and add puffy ack on the front lines.

then you....

Reduce the accuracy of the field ack, range of radars on bases and number of puffy ack by the % number of playes each chesspiece has.

It may or may not make folks switch sides, but the lower % chesspiece(s) would get ack help when defending and longer range warning of incomming attack so they could defend better. It would also make it easyer for the lower % chesspiece to attack because the bigger chesspice would get less warning and ack help.


Dunno if this can be done by the coaders ;)  at HTC, but its just an idea that po(o)pped up in my head just now.


Flame on!

Offline Reynolds

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2031
      • http://flyingknights.csmsites.com
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2006, 04:18:59 AM »
Dear god, that is the biggest piece of crap...




















Just kidding :aok I think that is an absolutely brilliant idea!

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2006, 04:54:56 AM »
i'm sorry nilsen, and i hate to be a stickler for details in the midst of these important matters but i must tell you that this is not, in fact, Side balancing idea number XXIXVII, it is rather, Side balancing idea number XXIXVIII.  

you would'nt have wanted to have been a part of Side balancing idea number XXIXVII...it ended in bloodshed.

sorry to interupt.  please.  do continue.

:)
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2006, 04:57:30 AM »
oh.  and FLAME!!!

click click

FLAME!!!!

click click

dammit.  flame thrower won't light.

mumble grumble...
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2006, 05:32:28 AM »
Those romans had it all wrong so blame them. I am infact... SPOT ON!

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2006, 06:13:34 AM »
i see.  well now we are in quite the quandry then eh my friend, you see, as we disagree and because the numbers are so close, we must now have an official recount to see which number post that it is.

since you are calling my typically perfect math into question, you leave me with no other honorable choice...

i call upon the ancient o'club rule of the right to a manual recount of the number of side balancing idea threads by threadmaster skuzzy.



:D
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #6 on: December 27, 2006, 06:31:42 AM »
That should give him something to do, but im confident that im spot on.

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2006, 06:38:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nilsen
That should give him something to do, but im confident that im spot on.


and i am confident that you are off by a million millionths of the number one.

you snow dwellers must have a different math or something.



:cool:
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Side balancing idea number XXIXVII
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2006, 02:22:00 AM »
yup :)