Author Topic: Baby flat tops.  (Read 613 times)

Offline G0ALY

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 660
Baby flat tops.
« on: January 09, 2007, 06:55:40 PM »
How about if each port had an escort carrier assigned to it in addition to the large CV group?

A jeep carrier with 2 destroyers that could operate independently of the large group… No LVTS, no PTs and a limited plane set.
My password at work had to contain exactly 8 characters… I chose Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2007, 08:42:34 PM »
Neat idea.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3907
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2007, 09:33:35 PM »
if I just had a place to spend perkies!

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2007, 07:47:17 AM »
Good idea! Would certainly spark some good CV vs Port fights.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2007, 04:38:01 PM »
i like the idea
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline prhim

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2007, 11:18:24 AM »
Yes.  The CVs are too easy to kill at the moment.  Having a back-up definitely has some merits.

Offline Kuhn

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 925
      • Canvasman
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2007, 11:37:16 AM »
I like it. Good idea GOALY. :aok
325th Checkertails

Offline Sabre

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3112
      • Rich Owen
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 12:25:39 PM »
Being mostly converted merchantmen, the escort carriers (CVE) were notoriously easy to sink.  I'm not sure what the point of adding them to ports is.  Would they be required to stay by the port, or just another free-roaming CV group?  If the former, why not just put an airstrip at a port?  If the latter, that's the same as adding a second CVBG to a port.

Now, I'm all for adding more ship types to the game.  However, CVE's had two primary functions.  First, they provided merchant convoys fighter cover and airborn ASW.  If we ever get merchant fleets, then adding a CVE to the convoy, with limited plane selection, would make sense.  Secondly, the CVEs were used during major landing operations, to support amphibias assaults; providing aircover and CAS. They were not fast enough to keep up with the fleet carriers, but were just fine for attacking fixed locations.  Since they were cheap to build, they could be risked in litoral waters, close in shore (see the Battle of Leyte Gulf for an example).  Because they were slow, they could not operate very heavily loaded a/c, and had rather limited (and vulnerable) storage for munitions and avgas.

Having said all that, another possible use for CVEs would be to actually remove the landing craft from the fleet carrier groups and build a separate amphibias assault group.  The ASG would have a couple of CVE's, a couple of cruisers for fire support, and a DE screen.  Each port would then have one CVBG and one ASG.  It would force the fleet carriers to operate in a more realistic manner, keeping them seaward of the ASG and providing the heavy hitting from afar.
Sabre
"The urge to save humanity almost always masks a desire to rule it."

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2007, 03:09:23 PM »
true sabre
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2007, 03:14:58 PM »
Could probably have the CVE groups respawn in less time when the flattop is down.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Baby flat tops.
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2007, 03:19:38 PM »
that is true
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com