Author Topic: Corsair testing  (Read 1133 times)

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Corsair testing
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2007, 10:30:02 PM »
Neil,

You are amazing man. Did you break into the National arcives or something??

I just got back from a week long business thing (slow death) and I just found your new reports.

What needs to be looked at is this report along with your new F4U and F6F reports listed in there indidual sections. You have posted at least 6 reports I have never seen before. It will be weeks before I can digest all of this information. One of the F6F reports shows test of up to 65" MAP.

BTW, I have too ask, there is mention of a comparitive test between F4U and F6F in your F6F-3 test report index conducted at Patuxant. Needless to say I know you post these reports in full and hold nothing back.

Something else that should be noted are the relative stall speeds of these aircraft as well as climb ability. The Speed of the F6F seems to echo the Vought report pretty closely. I think the Navy new what the true top speed of the F6F was. The airspeed indicator error was discovered before the production of the F6F-5.

The climb speeds of all aircraft are at Mil power according to the climb comparison chart. Notice the F4U-1 climbing in excess of 3,000FPM at 10K at mil power much higher than AH2. I am not altogether sure the speeds were not mesured at Mil as well because all aircraft tested seem a little slow.

Hats off Neil, You da man

Offline Neil Stirling

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
Corsair testing
« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2007, 03:34:55 AM »
Hi F4UDOA, bozon and dtango, thanks :aok   I have to say that all of the new American information came from Mike Williams. He has done a splendid job of uncovering new information over on your side :) and its thanks to him  for providing the web site.

I don't know about the F4U F6F comparison, but trust me if its there Mike will find it.

F4UDOA I can't get the performance calculator on your site to download can you help?

Neil.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2007, 04:16:16 AM by Neil Stirling »

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Corsair testing
« Reply #17 on: January 22, 2007, 05:30:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by dtango
I've wanted my 150 grade fuel Pony :).  75" Hg (444 mph woohoo!) vs. a 67" Hg. (130 grade - 427 mph).  1860 HP vs. 1690 HP.  That's what I'm talking about.

That would give me something to fight the 109K4 toe-to-toe with :).

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs


Hopefully that would be you going toe to toe with the 1.98ata 2,000hp 109K4 and not the 1.8ata model we have now...

EagleDNY
$.02

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Corsair testing
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2007, 09:15:16 AM »
Neil,

I sent you a message.

I will forward you an email ASAP.

Offline dtango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
Corsair testing
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2007, 09:09:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by EagleDNY
Hopefully that would be you going toe to toe with the 1.98ata 2,000hp 109K4 and not the 1.8ata model we have now...

EagleDNY
$.02


Just wanted to double check but I think the K4 version we have in AH2 is the 2000hp 1.98ata monster clocking in at a 451-456 mph top speed.  :)

http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=194384&referrerid=3699

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs
Tango / Tango412 412th FS Braunco Mustangs
"At times it seems like people think they can chuck bunch of anecdotes into some converter which comes up with the flight model." (Wmaker)