Originally posted by Hazzer
American foriegn policy..jeez...of course this is the country who trained and supplied ho chi min in 1945........of course once good old Ho had helped kick the japs out of indo china you sold him down the river just like the poor old Afghans who once they had kicked theRussians out, you left them to the Taliban.
You really are a peach.
Ho in 1945? Heck, we gave Joe Stalin Lend-Lease! This is gonna shock you, so hold on. Times change; Stalin was our ally and then suddenly...he wasn't. When we had a common enemy (Hitler) we were allies; when we defeated our common enemy... we became enemies ourselves. Amazing, eh? Can you grasp it? Times change.
Ho? Ho played all sides. Ho worked for the US OSS late in the war. He declared Vietnamese independence in August of 1945...yet he was out front welcoming the French back, signing March 1946 agreement allowing the French forces to return to Vietnam. In July of 1946 Ho's Viet Minh helped the French eliminate what was left of Vietnamese nationalist groups and then...oops...in December 1946, Ho's War of Resistance against the French forces started.
Times change, and so did Ho.
Saddam? Times change.
Say, in the history of the mighty, all-knowing British Empire, you guys ever change your minds about an ally, putting him over into the enemy column? Vice versa?
Or perhaps not; after all, your colonial rule left the world with such perfect divisions of populations that there have been no problem areas in any of your old colonies ever since.
Right? I mean, we can skip over Iraq...that one didn't work out too well for anyone but surely it wasn't the Empire's fault.
We'd best skip over Kashmir too, I guess.
And all those places in Africa where peace has yet to break out in your former colonies.
Ah well, I digress.
Congrats for dissing our history of foreign policy.
You guys were the experts, so we tip our hats in respect.