Author Topic: UFO filmed by NASA? (Read 831 times)

DREDIOCK · « **on:** February 10, 2007, 08:30:02 PM »

You decide if this NASA footage is real or not

Did NASA cameras capture a missile strike against a UFO? Also includes other mysterious footage of more... unidentified objects in space caught on NASA cameras

Evidence Of Missile Strike Against UFO On NASA Mission STS-48?

NASA FOOTAGE

Meatwad · « **Reply #1 on:** February 10, 2007, 09:59:28 PM »

I seen that on Discovery channel years ago, not really convincing to me.

But maybe im under mind control to make me believe that

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 10, 2007, 10:00:44 PM »

I've seen the footage before. I'm pretty sure the footage is real.

However, the flash and missile shooting past the UFO is fake. In all the times before that I've seen it, including on TV and on the internet, that missile WAS NEVER THERE.

Viking · « **Reply #3 on:** February 10, 2007, 10:37:35 PM »

This is my take on it:

It's an ice particle floating close to the camera. The ice particle is moving almost parallel to the shuttle, but because the shuttle had made very slight course adjustments the particle seems to move to the left (actually it is the shuttle that has started moving to the right relative to its previous parallel course with the particle).

The bright flash we see just before the "UFO" suddenly turns 180 is one of the shuttle's thrusters firing, so the particle isn't changing course at all, the shuttle is. And because the particle is so close (while it may look like it is a bigger object at greater a distance) a small change in the velocity of the shuttle yields a dramatic change in the velocity and direction of the particle on camera. The two seconds where the particle "stopped" as they mention in the video, was simply the thruster having to overcome the shuttle's inertia.

At least that's what I think.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #4 on:** February 10, 2007, 10:50:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Viking
This is my take on it:

It's an ice particle floating close to the camera. The ice particle is moving almost parallel to the shuttle, but because the shuttle had made very slight course adjustments the particle seems to move to the left (actually it is the shuttle that has started moving to the right relative to its previous parallel course with the particle).

The bright flash we see just before the "UFO" suddenly turns 180 is one of the shuttle's thrusters firing, so the particle isn't changing course at all, the shuttle is. And because the particle is so close (while it may look like it is a bigger object at greater a distance) a small change in the velocity of the shuttle yields a dramatic change in the velocity and direction of the particle on camera. The two seconds where the particle "stopped" as they mention in the video, was simply the thruster having to overcome the shuttle's inertia.

At least that's what I think.

As stated on the video and very true to the Laws of Physics, the camera angle never moved. Had thrusters been engaged, the image would have shifted.

Viking · « **Reply #5 on:** February 10, 2007, 10:56:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Masherbrum
As stated on the video and very true to the Laws of Physics, the camera angle never moved. Had thrusters been engaged, the image would have shifted.

Not if only the bow or stern thrusters were fired. Then the shuttle would only accelerate parallel to its original heading (assuming its nose is pointing in the direction of travel). The camera angle would not change at all. As long as the shuttle doesn't roll or pitch the camera angle will stay the same.

Slash27 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 11, 2007, 12:10:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
I've seen the footage before. I'm pretty sure the footage is real.

However, the flash and missile shooting past the UFO is fake. In all the times before that I've seen it, including on TV and on the internet, that missile WAS NEVER THERE.

The film is the same as it has been for years.

Mace2004 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 11, 2007, 01:30:32 AM »

Gotta love the creepy voice over used....lol. There are tons of these sorts of supposedly "unexplained" pictures and are favorite fodder for those that want to claim we never landed on the moon because there was supposedly no rocket exhaust when the LEM took off or the US flag "waved" as if there were wind. Same sort of crap is used by JFK assasination conspiracists, the "magic" bullet that is supposedly un-deformed and made an s-turn after passing through Kennedy, etc., it's pure nonsense.

Oh, I also loved the one guy who said that the film is easily brushed off by "skeptics" but is believable if you're "open minded". What a joke. Skeptical doesn't mean you're not open minded, it means you'd like to see some proof first. Skeptics are in fact the most open minded because they don't jump to conclusions just because some creepy voice tells you that you should.

MoeRon · « **Reply #8 on:** February 11, 2007, 04:01:36 AM »

"In December 1965, Gemini astronauts James Lovell and Frank Borman also saw a UFO during their second orbit of their record-breaking 14 day flight. Borman reported that he saw an unidentified spacecraft some distance from their capsule. Gemini Control, at Cape Kennedy told him that he was seeing the final stage of their own Titan booster rocket. Borman confirmed that he could see the booster rocket all right, but that he could also see something completely different.

During James Lovell's flight on Gemini 7:

Lovell: BOGEY AT 10 O'CLOCK HIGH.

Capcom: This is Houston. Say again 7.
Lovell: SAID WE HAVE A BOGEY AT 10 O'CLOCK HIGH.

Capcom: Gemini 7, is that the booster or is that an actual sighting?
Lovell: WE HAVE SEVERAL...ACTUAL SIGHTING.

Capcom: ...Estimated distance or size?
Lovell: WE ALSO HAVE THE BOOSTER IN SIGHT...

creepy..........

Ball · « **Reply #9 on:** February 11, 2007, 04:09:45 AM »

seems to travel too fast to be a missile. The distances involved would be massive and it covers it in less than a second (gotta be something like 100 miles in a second?)

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #10 on:** February 11, 2007, 04:27:23 AM »

The thing that came to my mind was that the objects could have been residue on the camera optics. When camera focus or filtering was changed due to the bright flash, the lenses rotate -> objects move.

Angus · « **Reply #11 on:** February 11, 2007, 08:45:46 AM »

This first thing looks like a clear moving object, going the camera's way. The way it moves has IMHO 2 easy explanations:
1. It is a doctored thing. A hoax. Low res like this are very easy to make compared to what the movies are doing.
2. It is an object moving fast in the direction of the camera. Like real life tracers from AA, when coming close and not hitting, it always seems that it's suddenly swaying away.

Not so sure about that one flying from the earth. Looks like a shooting star shown backwards and easy to doctor,

As for the circles Plasma or thunderbolts, - same phenomen. Not to be discarded, has been partially explained, has been related with gases and electrics, so where is a more likely place than near to extreme weather conditions?

cav58d · « **Reply #12 on:** February 11, 2007, 01:49:02 PM »

Looks like a

mandingo · « **Reply #13 on:** February 11, 2007, 02:21:17 PM »

it was Fester in his Lightening making a boom and zoom pass against nathbdp back in the day.