« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: Do you consider this acceptable?  (Read 5659 times)

Offline DaPup

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2007, 01:05:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDger
[B
1.  A squad member goes to the enemy team to warn main squad body of CV locations, or when/where mission ups from.

 [/B]



Perfectly acceptable when the mission is bombing TT VH's  lol :aok
Logged

Offline nexus69

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 108
      • http://www.708th.com
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #16 on: March 08, 2007, 01:05:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDger
For those that think that I was whining, please re-read the original post and grow up.

Didn't seem like whining to me, just asking a question.

People like to switch country sides periodically, sometimes so they are on disadvantaged teams to find action quickly...a myriad of reasons really.

.



I see your point DREDger and you do have a valid argument also. I guess I have been too blind to see the truth.
Logged

Offline Flatbar

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 621
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #17 on: March 08, 2007, 01:07:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDger


2.  A squad memeber goes to enemy team, does a dot wingman on a hated opponent, then relays info to the rest of squad...ie,  so 'n so just took off from A24 in an typhie headed northwest.



In cases of a legitimate dweeb hunt, this is acceptable...:aok


By legitimate I mean to say that the huntee did or does something that prompts the dweeb hunt.
Logged

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #18 on: March 08, 2007, 01:16:34 PM »
I think everything is acceptable to get us out of that bloody utarus map!
Logged

Offline DREDger

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #19 on: March 08, 2007, 01:16:40 PM »
Perfectly acceptable when the mission is bombing TT VH's lol

I think when you mean the mission is to capture TT island and take away GV fun...and as win the war map guys know, capturing the center islands is intragal to winning the map.


In cases of a legitimate dweeb hunt, this is acceptable...

My fiance considers me and everyone who plays this game to be dweebs.  


Personally I won't allow this activity in my squad.  I don't care if guys go play for another country or do their own thing for a spell.  Won't allow cross country communication of intell or dweeb hunting though (at least in so much as I would know about it)   Though I have been tempted in dweeb hunts cause some guys you know, just got it coming.

I think everything is acceptable to get us out of that bloody utarus map!

I'll second that, that map is about to make me puke, back n forth, back n forth...seems to be a stalemate in orange.  Half my squad went to blue last night just cause they couldn't stand looking at it anymore.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2007, 01:19:21 PM by DREDger »
Logged

Offline DaPup

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 259
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #20 on: March 08, 2007, 01:25:27 PM »
I think when you mean the mission is to capture TT island and take away GV fun...and as win the war map guys know, capturing the center islands is intragal to winning the map.


Just so long as you are ok with it :D
Logged

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #21 on: March 08, 2007, 01:28:17 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by nexus69
Do you consider acceptable that  half of a squad goes to the rooks side and the other half goes bishop.  Just so they can annihilate the Knights, and their CO considers this side balancing.


Before the flaming, smart bellybutton remarks and witted statements start flying.

All I want to know is, if anyone else finds this acceptable, normal. etc....

 Disclaimer:
The use ,reference, order and example of country names is pure unintentional


First ...

You would have to prove that that was their intent.

Second ...

I don't think you have the proof ... better yet ... I know you don't have proof.

Third ...

What would be the benefit of splitting to Rook and Bish to hit JUST Knights ?

If their real intent was to smash Knights, then logic would lean towards them all remaining together.

If they did split, then logic would lean towards them wanting to fight each other which means that they both (on different sides) were not all smashing Knights.

This has got to be a "I got an AK hair across my arse whine".

I was on the other night when AKs split to balance numbers. I flew with AKDogg and his group, and we attacked AKDG and his group ... was much fun until I had to log.

You speak of ethics and loyalty ... well I have been flying now for over 5+ years and have had many encounters AGAINST the AKs and many encounters WITH the AKs, and there is no other squad that comes to mind that takes to heart fair gameplay and ethics more than them.

If AKs split countries ... you can rest assured that they will not cross the line of fair gameplay. They are there for the fight and rest assured they will give you a fight you won't soon forget.

AKs don't need to spy/cheat to get the job done ... they have been around too long and know this game inside and out to have to rely on such tactis.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #22 on: March 08, 2007, 01:30:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by hubsonfire
As an aside, does anyone remember the whining the first times the AK switched sides? It's kind of funny (but mostly pathetic) that people are still whining about this.

I dont remember the whining,  I do remember the relief that we didnt have to worry about gettin beatup by em.   and boy could Curly fly a C-47 :lol  he was tough to kill
Logged

Offline Hoarach

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2406
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #23 on: March 08, 2007, 01:47:56 PM »
Yey side wars strike again. Loyalty to a chess piece.  :rolleyes:
Logged
Fringe
Nose Art
80th FS "Headhunters"

Secret Association of P38 Pilots

Offline 4deck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1520
      • (+) Precision
Uterus
« Reply #24 on: March 08, 2007, 01:57:28 PM »
OK I vote the knights win in Uterus, Ill log on about 6:00 pm est and we can reset then. TY

Do I hear a second :lol :rofl :lol :aok
Logged
Forgot who said this while trying to take a base, but the quote goes like this. "I cant help you with ack, Im not in attack mode" This is with only 2 ack up in the town while troops were there, waiting. The rest of the town was down.

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27316
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #25 on: March 08, 2007, 02:00:29 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDger
For those that think that I was whining, please re-read the original post and grow up.

Didn't seem like whining to me, just asking a question.

People like to switch country sides periodically, sometimes so they are on disadvantaged teams to find action quickly...a myriad of reasons really.

As far as a squad going to rook/knit to gang up on bish, I just don't see it making all that much difference.  Not to mention is wouldn't be nearly as affective as all staying in one country, then hording against whatever target.

If you think that is a problem though, consider these scenerios.

1.  A squad member goes to the enemy team to warn main squad body of CV locations, or when/where mission ups from.

2.  A squad memeber goes to enemy team, does a dot wingman on a hated opponent, then relays info to the rest of squad...ie,  so 'n so just took off from A24 in an typhie headed northwest.

There isn't any way to stop such activity, and it doesn't even have to be squads.  I have a brother who plays, and he has a cell phone as well, one could communicate info like that as well, independent of cross country text.

I think the only thing that prevents it is it just isn't all that much fun and takes a good deal of effort...most just want to up for a couple hours, shoot some bullets, then go do yard work or chores..hehe.



OMG the yard work... I gotta go................. :O
Logged
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline DadRabit

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #26 on: March 08, 2007, 02:03:25 PM »
S!

i switch sides now and then.  there are alot of great folks on the other side and 99.9% of em welcome you.  i do move back if a squaddie logs on but thats just my preferance.  been here a long time and i only have seen just several instances that irk me and those instances involved a small number o folks who switch just to warn of cv locations or missions etc....

my opion is i find nothing wrong with half a squad switching.  sounds like they were adapting to an eny situation or maby just trying to find new ways to have fun.  

my 2 cents

S!
Logged
David (Daddy Rabbit) Jester
S! 68KO
S! A8WB
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same. Ronald Reagan

Offline Gloves

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 470
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #27 on: March 08, 2007, 02:10:10 PM »
lol.  It's all part of the way things work.  HT makes a change for 'side balancing'.  Sooner or later, somebody finds a way around it so they can continue playing the game the way they want to.  In this case, a squad divides, half goes to another country, then they all attach the 3rd country.  An amusing work around.  Eventually, HT will make another change, then players will adjust and find a way around that too.

Glove
Logged

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #28 on: March 08, 2007, 02:14:03 PM »
WHAT?!?!?!?! I AM OUTRAGED :mad: :furious :mad: :mad: :furious :mad: :O :cry :confused: :furious
Logged

Offline VERTEX

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 216
Do you consider this acceptable?
« Reply #29 on: March 08, 2007, 02:16:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SkyRock
What?!!!:huh   You got me mixed up with a Blue Knight or Husky01!:eek:


I'm glad to see you have not lost your sense of humour.

By the way, when you going to take me to the DA and show me how to fly a Hog.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 7   Go Up
« previous next »