Author Topic: Hypocritical? (Read 1848 times)

JB88 · « **Reply #75 on:** March 12, 2007, 03:40:21 AM »

oh ya. almost forgot.

it's not about clinton.

its about newt.

a lie is a lie is a lie.

Kieran · « **Reply #76 on:** March 12, 2007, 06:31:54 AM »

Whuttevah.

Whatever point you're trying to make, aside from the juvenile, is being lost.

Xargos · « **Reply #77 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:33:14 AM »

I was wondering where all my booze went. It must have been 88 who drank it.

I still love you though 88.

Dago · « **Reply #78 on:** March 12, 2007, 04:45:32 PM »

is jb88 a little kid?

JB88 · « **Reply #79 on:** March 12, 2007, 04:51:11 PM »

and original too. your mother must be proud dago.

but lets get back on track here shall we?

newt lied.

he shamed the american people.

he shamed the republican party.

he will never be president.

(now fred thompson...he is a man who just might have what it takes)

Dago · « **Reply #80 on:** March 12, 2007, 06:48:58 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
and original too. your mother must be proud dago.

but lets get back on track here shall we?

newt lied.

he shamed the american people.

he shamed the republican party.

he will never be president.

(now fred thompson...he is a man who just might have what it takes)

I'm serious, your posts in this thread struck me so juvenile, I thought you might be a kid. Still do for that matter. How old are you?

JB88 · « **Reply #81 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:02:15 PM »

look dago.

im dead serious about newt.

a lie is a lie is a lie. he has shamed our people and should be held accountable, if only politically lest we continue to degrade the strong fabric that once held this country together.

as far as your commentary...well, take it however you would like. i am 37 and i still have a sense of humor.

so what?

seems to me that whenever anyone has a criticism for any republican demigog that the subject gets turned into an a priori arguement. please tell me that you have something better in your arsenal.

stay on topic dear man. its just not that hard.

Dago · « **Reply #82 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:19:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
he has shamed our people and should be held accountable, if only politically lest we continue to degrade the strong fabric that once held this country together.

My my, a little given to the dramatic aren't you? "shamed our people"?

You must really hate Clinton then.

If you imprisoned every congressman who cheated on his wife, the jails would be full and the Congress a lot quieter.

I happened to think the President lieing under oath to a grand jury is a bit more serious.

To say the American people are willing to overlook indiscretions is an understatement, as the saying goes, "Ted Kennedys car has killed more people than my guns".

Where is your outrage at that? Why aren't you hounding him?

JB88 · « **Reply #83 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:24:35 PM »

kennedy wont be president either.

i am not saying that newt should be jailed. i am saying that he should never hold office again and that he should be ashamed of himself for leading our country through a trial that he himself could not have passed.

Kieran · « **Reply #84 on:** March 12, 2007, 07:53:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
kennedy wont be president either.

i am not saying that newt should be jailed. i am saying that he should never hold office again and that he should be ashamed of himself for leading our country through a trial that he himself could not have passed.

Agree entirely.

john9001 · « **Reply #85 on:** March 12, 2007, 08:26:57 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
kennedy wont be president either.

i am not saying that newt should be jailed. i am saying that he should never hold office again and that he should be ashamed of himself for leading our country through a trial that he himself could not have passed.

so, this newt guy forced clinton to lie under oath, lie to hillery, lie to the american people (i never had sex yada yada).

now i know why you fear this newt guy, he must be very powerful and dangerous.

JB88 · « **Reply #86 on:** March 12, 2007, 08:28:20 PM »

lol.

you must be some sort of comedian.

i have been misreading you all along john. you are actually being funny. lol

Toad · « **Reply #87 on:** March 12, 2007, 09:50:06 PM »

The interesting part is the reaction of the observers.

Clinton lied under oath about an affair yet his supporters on the liberal side felt he should remain in office.

Gingrich lied to his wife, admitted it to the public when simply asked and only a very few on either the liberal or conservative side feel he remains qualified to hold public office. (I am not one of those.)

We get the politicians we deserve. If you can defend Clinton's lie, you deserve lying politicians.

Rotax447 · « **Reply #88 on:** March 13, 2007, 04:36:28 AM »

“Clinton lied under oath!”

Hmm, I didn't know that Willy was convicted of lying under oath. Is that statement a lie, or is it simply...inoperative?

“I did not have 'sexual relations' with that woman, Ms. Lewinski.”

Blackwells Law Dictionary defined 'sexual relations' as sexual intercourse. Willy was telling the truth. He did not have sexual intercourse with Ms. Lewinski...the cigar did.

“Did you have 'sexual contact' with Ms. Lewinski?”

Of course not! The mouth is not legally defined as a sex organ. If Willy's peter was in contact with Ms. Lewinski's mouth, then it would be correct to say that she had sexual contact with him.

Aren't lawyers clever? And, when you combine them with a politician, they give us endless hours of amusement watching their testimony.

If one were to say that US District Judge, Susan Webber, was not amused by all of this, that would be true. She found Willy in contempt of her court, and fined him accordingly. Willy chose not to fight the contempt charge, via a trial by jury, and paid the fine.

“a lie is a lie is a lie”

That depends on what the definition of the word is, is :-)