Author Topic: Which one is better (Read 366 times)

croduh · « **on:** April 16, 2007, 05:36:12 AM »

Gf 6200 or Radeon 9600 xt, both agp.
Now i know they are both outdated, but which one is better?

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #1 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:22:45 AM »

Pick radeon, way better image quality. Geforce sucks, I know I recently bought the 8800.

Hoarach · « **Reply #2 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:23:29 AM »

Well I really like my PNY Verto Geforce 7600GS 512MB AGP.

MrRiplEy[H] · « **Reply #3 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:42:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Hoarach
Well I really like my PNY Verto Geforce 7600GS 512MB AGP.

I would only pick geforce if I had an lcd digitally connected to the box. Analog quality is horrible in all geforce series.

38ruk · « **Reply #4 on:** April 16, 2007, 04:30:21 PM »

the 9600XT is quite a bit better , ive found two comparisons below , even with the 9600xt being in a 3.2ghz pentium 4 test rig , it beats the 6200 that was in a AMD64 4000+ test rig . The 4000+ system would be faster than the P4 machine .

There are other games you can look at that match up on both of these reviews , just keep in mind that the 9600 is in a slower system and still wins . Sometimes newer isn't always better .

Its really hard to find a direct comparison for the two cards , so you have to kinda piece together benchmarks from here and there , its not perfect but it should help you decide GL

6200/ AMD64 4000+
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/12/22/vga_charts_v/page5.html

9600XT/ 3.2ghz P4
http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/10/04/vga_charts_iv/page7.html

Fulmar · « **Reply #5 on:** April 16, 2007, 05:57:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
Pick radeon, way better image quality. Geforce sucks, I know I recently bought the 8800.

Not even remotely sure how you can claim this on the 8800.

Krusty · « **Reply #6 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:00:09 PM »

I don't have (and haven't ever had) problems with nvidia cards.

However, in this case, consider the following: The 6200 is a stripped down, budget card, while the 9600xt is a full-blown, full-power, gaming card. Definitely go with the 9600xt, if those are your only two choices.

Brooke · « **Reply #7 on:** April 16, 2007, 07:23:51 PM »

I have had good luck with and have been very please with both nVidia and Radeon cards. I usually pick whichever is the best performance/price at the time.

Roscoroo · « **Reply #8 on:** April 16, 2007, 08:24:19 PM »

im still gaming on a crucial 9600 pro card . it plays AH2 just fine . just dont expect to run it at the huge 1600 x monitor resolutions .

the 6200 IMO would be a step down .

Hoarach · « **Reply #9 on:** April 16, 2007, 09:16:43 PM »

I dont know if still selling though but the PNY 7600GS AGP 512MB was $150 at compusa which is where I got mine. Its $145 at tigerdirect and $140 at newegg.

Vulcan · « **Reply #10 on:** April 16, 2007, 09:43:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
I would only pick geforce if I had an lcd digitally connected to the box. Analog quality is horrible in all geforce series.

Odd all the geforces I use have been fine. Plus ATI doesn't do any true 3D support (but I spose not than many people use it).