Every second of airtime, every drop of ink given to this creep increase the probability that some other creep will emulate him and try to beat his record.
This should be reported but it should be done so in a manner that will not provide the scumbag with an epitaph. It should also not be memorialized every year by the mass media. I do not want to appear to be trivialising the loss of those folks at all. I just want there to be a cessation of the inevitible Columbine massacre recreations and rememberances on the news in the weeks leading up to the anniversary date. Continually regurgitating the situation only increases the chance some whack job will think it's his turn to become immortalized in the news doing the same damn thing.
Yeah it would be nice if the media would just let it go, but I bet withing a couple of months you'll be seeing commercials for "VT Bloody Campus" the made for TV movie. It's sad but it sells and for the media it's all about the bottom line, not what's good for the general public.
Well, it is odd that we've only had any significant amount of this type of "glory suicide" in about the last 15-20 years or so. Corresponds well to sensational mass media coverage, 24-hour news channels hosing out infotainment and a pop culture that glorifies firearm violence beyond reality and far beyond what was common on the airwaves or screens as late as the 1970s.
I support the 1st Amendment, and believe that freedom isn't clean, cheap or easy and that you have to take the occasional bad or even horrific for the overall good. But it would be nice to see the media actually turn the microscope on it's own dominant role in motivating such events rather than focusing on the tool used in the crime. Hell, the guy even prepared his own press kit.
Oddly, there appears to actually be balanced coverage (by media standards) of the firearm angle this time around. Still puzzling over that clear change of events. The tinfoil hat in me says they don't want to make this a campaign issue before 08. Or, perhaps it's something far more simple. Perhaps the message has actually gotten out, or they've starting to pay attention to the loss of viewers or readers.
But seeing the media take a hard look at itself (I'm sure there will be a few soft 5-15 minute perspectives, perhaps) would really be a surprise. Given his clear linkage to the promotion of the event and the killings, perhaps it will be too hard to ignore. Or, perhaps they just blame the school's actions or failures in the mental health programs and bypass both firearms and the media circus as safely as possible.
I would disagree that the video games "motivate" these actions. Contribute to someone already unhindged -- perhaps. But the overwhelming motivation seems to be the publicity, and specifically so in this case. The killer himself cites that.
[EDIT: Frankly, on consideration, this guy just seems to be ****ing nuts from a society influence standpoint. He clearly wanted the publicity, but his favorite band was Collective Soul of all things, and he rails against debauchery and materialsim in society.]
Charon