Author Topic: Progressive Pane Set ?  (Read 1524 times)

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23931
      • Last.FM Profile
Progressive Pane Set ?
« Reply #45 on: April 29, 2007, 06:19:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kotrenin
The EWA never really had all the numbers. .



Almost looks like you weren't there. Trust me, after the split almost nobody was in MW & LW. All people did log into EW first beacause of a) novelty value, b) everybody was there and c) because it was just the first arena on the list. Only about after a week or even more, the numbers gradually diminished. If people only cared about the numbers, they would have stayed. Apparently they had resons beyond pure numbers to leave EW...

Not that this makes your statement completely non-valid at all. Certainly many people will just follow the crowd.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline kotrenin

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 397
      • http://http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRaTekm9Ak8
Progressive Pane Set ?
« Reply #46 on: April 29, 2007, 07:14:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lusche
Almost looks like you weren't there.


Actualy, I did miss the first week, I was on vacation.  But I consider the "begining" the first tour, and I know when squads were deciding which arena to base themselves in they chose LW to give their members a larger choice of rides.  That's what the CO of my squad did.  Yes, I understand people made the conscious decision to fly in the LW after trying the EW & MW, Thats fine.  But I think HTC needs to even out the arenas a little.  Losing the second LW and putting a larger CAP on on the first would bring the numbers up in all the arenas actualy making it easier to find a horde.  And their would still be the dueling arena, AvA, and the corners of the large maps for the gunslingers looking for 1 on 1's.  The multiple arenas would still help prevent server overload.
Here's a clip from the HTC archives mentioning the small caps.

"September 13, 2006
Aces High II: Arena Format Change Thanks to your patronage Aces High has grown to the point where a single Main Arena is no longer a sufficient solution...

Being in this business a long time, we understand that people are creatures of habit and old habits die-hard. Going through any major change is uncomfortable until people become acclimated to the change. This change is especially difficult because we cannot simply add these new arenas; we need to redistribute how the arenas are populated. To accomplish that, we’re going to be reducing arena caps so as to not have one arena dominate just by virtue of everybody following the herd. We’ll also be using small terrains exclusively for now, but that is not a permanent change. Once we’re comfortable that people have acclimated to the new format, we’ll begin to work those elements back in."

I think we should go back to this.
He's a lover, not a fighter... but he's also a fighter, so don't get any ideas. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRaTekm9Ak8  http://one_foggy.tripod.com/sounds/afu_jokeson.wav

Offline GooseAW

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 566
      • http://www.chawks.com
Progressive Pane Set ?
« Reply #47 on: April 30, 2007, 02:25:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
So, since the early war and mid war arenas don't have enough people to suit you, you'd like to create a forced early and mid war arena so people would have to fly whatever period you'd prefer for a certain amount of time each month, by forcing a rolling plane set. That's a GREAT idea!:rofl Should be easily as popular as various assorted STD's.


There have been other less extreme options/ideas posted as well...none by you however. I prefer not to try to make this a s*&t slinging contest however.

As I see it, there are basically 3 unused arenas and 2 overpopulated with LA7s etc.... You can't deny there is room for improvement. Now are interested enough in put a little thought into how that might be accomplished?

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Progressive Pane Set ?
« Reply #48 on: April 30, 2007, 02:56:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by GooseAW
Now are interested enough in put a little thought into how that might be accomplished?


The problem is that you are trying to push an idea that has been 1) rejected by the majority of the community and 2) rejected by HiTech.  A RPS plane set is just not going to happen, no matter how long you how blue you become in the face.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Progressive Pane Set ?
« Reply #49 on: April 30, 2007, 07:34:38 PM »
That horse is DEAD, leave it alone.

Although I am somewhat puzzled by the initial post.  You seem to indicate Newbies in ENY 5 aircraft is a BAD thing?
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&