Originally posted by straffo
I wonder why you can write this in this place without being at risk to be banned.
But it's how the O'club became...
The republibots can have their free (hate) speech when the others are banned.
You assume that what he wrote isn't true. Maybe it is, maybe it is not. It is however undeniable that the Democrats gleefully attack the military at every opportunity, and that they use every setback as a chance to further their political agenda.
As far as it goes, you are as guilty as anyone, with your accusations of hate, and your name calling (republibots?). So perhaps you might want to consider how the other side sees you, before you go too far off on the "hate speech" tangent.
Several facts cannot be disputed.
A war cannot be run by committee.
No war can be successfully prosecuted any where by any nation when half of that nation uses every setback as a chance to trumpet their agenda, proclaim complete failure, and demand surrender.
Actions such as those taken by many Democrats as well as much of the media are an unacceptable attack from home on the morale and well being of the troops, as well as an aid and comfort to the enemy.
The war has not gone as well as anyone would have liked, maybe not as well as it could have, but probably no better than could actually have been expected.
The strategy of the Bush administration has not been perfect, far from it, and could be improved greatly. The strategy of the Democrats, however, once the war didn't go perfect, has been non existent, other than the offer of a timetable for complete surrender.
The Democrats stand to benefit greatly from a failure in the war, and they know it. They appear to be determined to see it through to that end.
