Author Topic: LVT shore transition (Read 423 times)

Bad31st · « **on:** June 22, 2007, 02:19:58 PM »

Last night in LW Orange when trying to drive an LVT from the CV to the field several of us could not transition from water to land - it was as though we were still in the water complete with wake though the terrain was green...also several of us got stuck in the terrain / bounced 20 feet or so in the air / repeatedly rolled etc...

Just double checked the readme from the last patch - supposedly was fixed - maybe just not on that map?

Have film if more info is needed...

Spikes · « **Reply #1 on:** June 22, 2007, 03:20:47 PM »

No. It is a bug, that does need to be fixed. It is a major problem with V-Bases.

fuzeman · « **Reply #2 on:** June 23, 2007, 10:28:43 AM »

In these situations it's helpful to note which map and at what field it happens. I'd assume the location, as specific as you can be, would also help.
Run a short film and send it in, that should cover all the issues I mentioned.

Bad31st · « **Reply #3 on:** June 23, 2007, 05:12:33 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by fuzeman

Run a short film and send it in, that should cover all the issues I mentioned.

I'd do that but I'm not sure of what address to use...is it support@hitechcreations.com?

Bad31st · « **Reply #4 on:** June 24, 2007, 02:59:15 AM »

Had another instance of this happen tonight same arena different field - A30 I think - but this time I wasn't as affected but at least 1 lvt got stuck in the terrain...

Again I have a film...will send both to support@hitechcreations.com unless there is a better address...

badhorse · « **Reply #5 on:** June 25, 2007, 06:50:27 AM »

This happens a lot. Best bet is to make sure you are in 1st gear during the transition (until you know you are on solid ground) and then just hope for the best.

Hope they fix this soon.

fuzeman · « **Reply #6 on:** June 25, 2007, 09:42:05 AM »

Either support@ or sudz@ HTC, I think either of those should be ok.

-sudz- · « **Reply #7 on:** June 25, 2007, 09:43:20 AM »

This has been fixed and will be included in the next patch. In the meantime, if you are approaching a beach with NO tank traps visible then steer to a beach which has some. Although not related to the bug it's a visible indicator that the beach you're approaching has the problem.

- sudz

VansCrew1 · « **Reply #8 on:** June 26, 2007, 01:24:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by -sudz-
This has been fixed and will be included in the next patch. In the meantime, if you are approaching a beach with NO tank traps visible then steer to a beach which has some. Although not related to the bug it's a visible indicator that the beach you're approaching has the problem.

- sudz

when is the next patch.

Motherland · « **Reply #9 on:** June 26, 2007, 02:13:34 PM »

Bf 109 T. Never saw service , that I know of (at least in it's intended role), but I think it would be a fun addition.

"Initially ten Bf 109E-3 were ordered to be modified to Bf 109T-0 standard. This included, adding a tail-hook, catapult fittings, structural strengthening, manually folding wings and increased wingspan (to 11.08 m). Also the landing gear track was a little wider. Thus prepared, the Bf 109T probably would have been proven much better for carrier operations than the British Supermarine Seafire, a hardly modified landplane that suffered from a bad accident rate flying from carriers."

But, more importantly, JU 52!

Spikes · « **Reply #10 on:** June 26, 2007, 02:25:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Motherland
Bf 109 T. Never saw service , that I know of (at least in it's intended role), but I think it would be a fun addition.

"Initially ten Bf 109E-3 were ordered to be modified to Bf 109T-0 standard. This included, adding a tail-hook, catapult fittings, structural strengthening, manually folding wings and increased wingspan (to 11.08 m). Also the landing gear track was a little wider. Thus prepared, the Bf 109T probably would have been proven much better for carrier operations than the British Supermarine Seafire, a hardly modified landplane that suffered from a bad accident rate flying from carriers."

But, more importantly, JU 52!

Wrong forum?