Author Topic: What would you like to see in a new MA map? (Read 1103 times)

WWhiskey · « **Reply #30 on:** July 23, 2007, 12:31:07 PM »

new is good lets see something
even modify that strange female part map
(cant think of the name right now) with more islands and ports
disco. the outer rim per sides. tt or ft right in the middle of course
so all can complain about everyone playing there and no one trying to take the map!!

all that is new, is good, till something better, comes along.

tnx jeff
p.s. guess that kinda sounds like tt map we have now
thought i was on a roll

Spikes · « **Reply #31 on:** July 23, 2007, 12:41:14 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by USCH
high alt bomber base... takeoff say 15k...
lots of ports say 7 per side...

I'd like to see less noobs on game+ forums

Shuffler · « **Reply #32 on:** July 23, 2007, 12:50:24 PM »

Better looking sheep... the old ones are getting saggy.
This would keep Raptor busy so he'll quit steling my kills

Solar10 · « **Reply #33 on:** July 24, 2007, 11:27:21 AM »

My attempt so far for MA map
Comments are welcome.

I want the central island to be mostly for GVs to keep the majority of the air battle being CV or island based on the perimeter. The volcano in the middle is 14K (IIRC) with a tank town in the cauldron.

(I did post this in the terrain editor forum as well)

Westy · « **Reply #34 on:** July 24, 2007, 11:52:26 AM »

nude beaches

Atoon · « **Reply #35 on:** July 24, 2007, 07:37:22 PM »

Being actually added to the current rotation would be the best new map feature I could think to ask for.

From what I hear we have many new maps, just none that get added to rotation.

WWhiskey · « **Reply #36 on:** July 24, 2007, 08:59:56 PM »

looks good so far

SOB · « **Reply #37 on:** July 24, 2007, 10:13:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Westy
nude beaches

Shaved sheep?

USCH · « **Reply #38 on:** July 25, 2007, 12:52:15 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by 68ROX
REAL LOCATION maps. Yeah, Baltic Map has been played more in this game than "Stairway To Heaven" By Zeppelin has been played on the radio.

JEEBUS! You can have a map of Illinois, Wisconsin, Indiana & Michigan and split it evenly between 3 sides.

68ROX

that would be great! i could land in my grandfathers field and see my family b4 i was born

USCH · « **Reply #39 on:** July 25, 2007, 12:55:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by NHawk
A terrain where...

People don't complain that..

the bases are too far apart.
the bases are too close together.
the mountains are too high.
the mountains are too low.
the spawns are too close.
the spawns are too far away.
there are not enough cv's.
there are too many cv's.
there are too many gv bases.
there are not enough gv bases.

One where people just don't complain and appreciate the fact that there is a new map to fly on.

Make that and you've made the ideal terrain for everyone.

I have that on in my pocket (ill sell it to you for $500,000 US)

Nilsen · « **Reply #40 on:** July 25, 2007, 01:21:32 PM »

Id like to alot of cv action in a new map, and islands.

Another idea would be a 3 sliced pizza were all 3 are equal with a row of small islands with small airbases and/or ports on them between the 3 slices.

Muskie6 · « **Reply #41 on:** July 25, 2007, 01:28:39 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Meatwad
Thats a silly rule

If we cant have FT, then TT should be removed also

For all intensive purposes, TT has already been removed. Have you been there lately?

RetroVirus · « **Reply #42 on:** July 25, 2007, 03:36:25 PM »

I'm new, but I do like the CV action!

Agent360 · « **Reply #43 on:** July 25, 2007, 04:52:00 PM »

The map looks good.

What I would like to see in a new map:

A lot of bases close together. About 1/2 to 1/4 of radar radius between them. No freaken 8k mountains put directly in every flight path to a base. No 5k bases near 0k bases where all you do is get picked continually by incoming pickers.

High terrain is time consuming to get around or over. If players want to cherry pick fine. Let them fly to 20k. Don't force people to go that high with terrain around a field.

I hate having to fly 5 min or longer to a base. Its hard enough to get kills in this game with all the good sticks and gangbang furballs. So flying 5 min or longer to get killed immediatly is just stupid to me. Currently in a short time all the close bases are taken by a country and all that is left are the "hard" bases to take.....the ones far from each other. So no one ups there and no one takes them...so they are a waste on the map. Seems like all people want to do is "stop" a good fight....kill the cv...take the base...then what.... goof around for 30 more min waiting for a fight to evolve.

My biggest complaint about the current MA maps are the TIME it takes to get into a good fight. Make so that we can actually play the game instead of flying and flying and flying some more to get there.

I think most people play AH to dog fight anyway.

I really wish we could have a "Dog fighting" arena with these kinds of maps. I am not taling about a 3 base FT map. That sucks too cause u cant engage without being ganged. One with like 50 bases all within 1/2 radar radius betweed radar ranges. Reasonable terrain and some water.

I bet an areana like that would be full all the time.

Motherland · « **Reply #44 on:** July 25, 2007, 09:34:59 PM »

What would be interesting...

A map with many ports (4-5) and many islands (a lot), sorta like tanktown, but more, smaller islands, all with 1-2 bases on them. The 'Main' Island would have all strats, 1 airfeild in the middle, and a port (I dont know, spurting out ideas). The most important part, instead of a large island with TT/FT in the middle, just a stretch of ocean. CV Town, if you will. Hopefully, all side would send in their ships, and CVs would intermingle, etc, etc.