S.O.S.

[SteveBailey]

Originally posted by froger
God bless the harmless muppet banter...
    flame away ladies......

Personally, I think that phrase is bunk.

[Atoon]

Originally posted by moneyguy
although sometimes it seems that 2 countries have truces, if you switch to the other countries you will find that its the same on the other sides. i have played all sides before. its the same thing on each of them. the only thing that's different is the names of the people that are friendly.

Sometimes thats true, but manytimes its not. No dar bar + no base flash = no fight. Switching sides is how I brake the truce. if 3-4 people switch sides from the country being ganged, and start a attacking on the front of the trucing countries, a fight will always start, and the truce will be over.

HTC just hosts the game, it's up to the players how it is played.

I'm not at all surprised to be attacked by member(s) of a particular squad for this post,  after all there was about 7 of them involved in last nights truce.

[Stang]

Truce?

Oh boy...

[Atoon]

Originally posted by Stang


Truce?

Oh boy...

What would you call it Stang, when 2 of 3 countries completely ignore each other and fight only the 3rd?

[wnt2]

Originally posted by Atoon   "I just think its sad & pathetic when kuntries stroke each others sacks  instead of fighting, it's somthing I have always been above participating in."

Fighting or sack stroking??  

I seem to always miss the foreplay  

wnt2

[SteveBailey]

Originally posted by Atoon
What would you call it Stang, when 2 of 3 countries completely ignore each other and fight only the 3rd?

The fantasy of a deluded whiner.

[Atoon]

You can deny it all ya want, but that doesnt stop it from being true.

[hubsonfire]

It's not a truce, it's just the herding behavior. You can get very few people on any side to defend against a mob, or attack a new front. Either no one defends that front, or everyone does, leaving some other area vacant, and the cycle starts anew.

With all due respect anton, you do exactly the same thing. Many of us are guilty of it. I don't play for hours, and don't give a nut lik about the war- I just head where there's some action most nights. That normally means finding a fight in progress, without regard for the overall distribution of fights between countries.

[Eagler]

Originally posted by Atoon
What would you call it Stang, when 2 of 3 countries completely ignore each other and fight only the 3rd?

Inferiority complex on your part?

I switch countries and go to the low side just about every time I log on or when I notice it getting lopsided ... otherwise it is hard to find/get a kill when the green horde buzzing around you all the time

[Atoon]

Originally posted by hubsonfire
It's not a truce, it's just the herding behavior. You can get very few people on any side to defend against a mob, or attack a new front. Either no one defends that front, or everyone does, leaving some other area vacant, and the cycle starts anew.

With all due respect anton, you do exactly the same thing. Many of us are guilty of it. I don't play for hours, and don't give a nut lik about the war- I just head where there's some action most nights. That normally means finding a fight in progress, without regard for the overall distribution of fights between countries.

Your right Hub, Its not really a "truce" because there was most likely no agreed terms. I do not however participate, at least not once I realize the situation is developing, when I reealize whats hapening, I either try to break it up or log off.  The reason being that it doesnt take long for the numbers to sway so much that the fights become lopsided causing reduced fun. I get no pleasure from hording or being horded, and when 2 countries stop fighting each other, hordes are what develope. As if that wasnt bad enuff, its usually a horde of EZmode simp rides.

[Gulp]

I like all the maps.  I like to furball, take fields, gv, bomb, gang, and up against impossible odds.  Just depends on my mood at the moment.  Lately I don't mind when my side is getting rolled because I'm working on Field & Osti gunning.

I can usually find something fun on any map.  The only thing that bugs me is when I only have time to jump in for one quick sortie and there's no close action.

Aspen

[Stang]

Originally posted by Atoon
Your right Hub, Its not really a "truce"  

Well then why come in here *****ing up a storm about something you fabricated?  There is no truce, you said it yourself.  Yet it took a 2nd page of your whinefest for you to admit it.    

Want a box of cleenex?

[Atoon]

Originally posted by Stang
Well then why come in here *****ing up a storm about something you fabricated?  There is no truce, you said it yourself.  Yet it took a 2nd page of your whinefest for you to admit it.    

Want a box of cleenex?

Stang you can spin it anyway you want, but if you dont wanna addres the issue you never will. Call it whatever ya want, it exists.


The origin is different, but the outcome is the same.

[Stang]

An actual truce is a much different thing than the consequences of herd/slumming behavior on the player's part.  

Sorry, if you want symapthy for your argument, try framing it in the correct context instead of being hysterical about it.

Edit: The intent is everything here.  Your argument using the word
"truce" implies conspiracy of two countries vs the third.  There is no such thing.  The two are totally different, even if the outcome is supposedly the same (which it really isn't).

[Atoon]

Nothing in my post was hysteric. You can outright deny that it happens all ya want. You cant however change what I already know as fact. However, since I don't care to learn how to post screenshots & films, I will not be providing the proof I have access to, Congrats:aok