« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 111  (Read 433 times)

Offline lasse

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 283
      • Lassenet
111
« on: July 30, 2007, 02:27:36 AM »
HE 111

I believe this is the most obvious plane that is missing from the Aces High planeset.

After all it was used in huge numbers in all theaters the Germans were fighting in.

So with the arrival of B25.( Witch is excellent in my eyes), I really hope that Hitech and crew finally makes the HE 111.

( It would be great to have the Condor to, in the German planeset, but the HE 111 is way more important.)

I know this is not the first request for this plane, but I take the liberty to ask for it again ;-)
Logged
You smell that? Do you smell that?
Napalm, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that.
I love the smell of napalm in the morning.
The smell, you know that gasoline smell, smelled like victory.

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
111
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2007, 05:28:44 AM »
The He111 was not voted for nearly as much as the B25. Therefor, we get a B25.
Logged
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
111
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2007, 06:45:11 AM »
only Axis planes we need are the Ki-100 and I.A.R. 81c.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2007, 07:57:24 AM by Masherbrum »
Logged
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
111
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2007, 07:26:12 AM »
Im all for the 111, and im pretty sure that we will get it eventually. :)
Logged

storch

  • Guest
111
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2007, 08:25:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
only Axis planes we need are the Ki-100 and I.A.R. 81c.
and the Fiat G55
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
111
« Reply #5 on: July 30, 2007, 09:50:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
only Axis planes we need are the Ki-100 and I.A.R. 81c.


We have the Ki61. It's identical in almost every way to the Ki100. Just pretend the engine sounds are different and you're set.
Logged

Offline detch01

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1788
111
« Reply #6 on: July 30, 2007, 09:59:07 AM »
The He-111 was one of the group of aircraft voted on. IRRC the vote wasn't on which one we'd get, but which one we'd get first. :aok



Cheers,
asw
Logged
asw
Latrine Attendant, 1st class
semper in excretio, solum profundum variat

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
111
« Reply #7 on: July 30, 2007, 10:52:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
We have the Ki61. It's identical in almost every way to the Ki100. Just pretend the engine sounds are different and you're set.
Different engine, you getting rusty on the "know-it-all's" Krusty.    Pick up the pace.
Logged
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
111
« Reply #8 on: July 30, 2007, 10:54:04 AM »
Yes, different engine, but 99.9% identical performance across the board. Hence my comment "imagine different engine sounds"....

The Ki100 was no better than the Ki61, in regards to performance. There were minor changes but nothing noteworthy. It was more a stop-gap, desperate "get any plane in the air" conversion
Logged

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
111
« Reply #9 on: July 30, 2007, 10:59:14 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Yes, different engine, but 99.9% identical performance across the board. Hence my comment "imagine different engine sounds"....

The Ki100 was no better than the Ki61, in regards to performance. There were minor changes but nothing noteworthy. It was more a stop-gap, desperate "get any plane in the air" conversion
Actually it was a high altitude plane that turned better, climbed better.   So more than "just a slight difference".
Logged
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
111
« Reply #10 on: July 30, 2007, 11:02:03 AM »
Nope. Look it up again. It had *slightly* better climb at alt, but only because of a *slight* weight decrease.

It's climb rate was a small % increased over the 61, but nothing phenominal. The radial was no better than other contemporary japanese radials (nothing especially "high alt" about it) and the top speed was nearly identical to the Ki61.


It's been discussed ad nauseum in the wishlists forum, many times over many years.

EDIT: I did a quick search.

Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
I also agree with you that the Ki-61 negates the need for the Ki-100. The biggest difference between the two was simplicity of engine management and increased reliability of the radial engine. However, in AH2 our engine management is already as simple as it gets and engine reliability is not modeled.

The only advantages associated with the Ki-100 may be improved rearward vision and no radiator to leak coolant. Countering that is increased drag and reduced vision over the nose.
« Last Edit: July 30, 2007, 11:16:18 AM by Krusty »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »