Author Topic: Gonzales has resigned (Read 2382 times)

bj229r · « **Reply #60 on:** August 27, 2007, 08:11:02 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Maybe you should try doing something besides the knee-jerk poor GWB is sooo innocent cause look at Clinton crap and maybe even look at the facts of the situation.

Do you really think Gonzalez has done a good job as AG? Have you listened to the testimony he was giving Senators? Put down the kool aid little one and maybe this can be a learning experience.

MP?? That is funny.

Gonalez was an ineffectual AG, and it is good that he is gone (would have been better he nor Harriet Myers not had been in administration to begin with) Does it matter WHO is AG? no. About the time our next pres is inaugurated, his replacement AG will finish the Senate hearings, and it won't matter who THAT is either (hearing rumblings about Chertoff...putz) Does THAT make ya happy? Won't make Henry Waxman happy...though no crime in the US Attorney firings has been found or even alleged, 18 months remain for him to have hearings!

crockett · « **Reply #61 on:** August 27, 2007, 08:37:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JBA
They may have, I have not found a full list for GHWB or jr. but here are Clinton's

There were many more Pardfons for both.. you have to look them up by the president name if you are looking on wikipedia

Bush Sr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_pardoned_by_George_H._W._Bush

Clinton
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardons_controversy

Bush Jr.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_pardoned_by_George_W._Bush

I will agree that Clinton had the most, and I thought what he did his last week was a major black mark on his presidency. The deal is both of the Bush's have pardoned people for some of the exact same things Clinton pardoned people for, Clinton just did more of them. (however Bush Sr only had 4 years to Clinton's 8 and Bush Jr isn't done yet.)

Also, one I found that was very interesting was the pardon of Marc Rich by Clinton. His pardon was suggested by none other that Scooter Libby, which is fairly ironic.

Really this isn't the topic for that subject, but I just figured I'd point you in the right place to find the info.

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #62 on:** August 27, 2007, 08:52:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by bj229r
Gonalez was an ineffectual AG, and it is good that he is gone (would have been better he nor Harriet Myers not had been in administration to begin with) Does it matter WHO is AG? no. About the time our next pres is inaugurated, his replacement AG will finish the Senate hearings, and it won't matter who THAT is either (hearing rumblings about Chertoff...putz) Does THAT make ya happy? Won't make Henry Waxman happy...though no crime in the US Attorney firings has been found or even alleged, 18 months remain for him to have hearings!

Gonzales' ineffectiveness can only be attributed to the ramblings of the incoherent democratic party. What they did was akin to freaking out that Gonzales consumed Dihydrogen Monoxide. http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

They took a common occurance, and by portraying it in a certain way, made it seem evil. When in effect, all Gonzales was doing was drinking water.

68Hawk · « **Reply #63 on:** August 28, 2007, 04:40:48 AM »

Then why didn't he remember that he was drinking water?

Eagler · « **Reply #64 on:** August 28, 2007, 05:57:49 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
They took a common occurance, and by portraying it in a certain way, made it seem evil.

that is all the dems have done since nov 06 - witch hunt in preperation of Nov 08

sad part is the average joe is dumb enough to fall for it as they never take the time to investigate anything themselves because it is easier/faster to swallow the liberal media taking heads spoon fed agenda before they flip over to the next "reality" tv show..

JB88 · « **Reply #65 on:** August 28, 2007, 06:29:17 AM »

uh huh.

midnight Target · « **Reply #66 on:** August 28, 2007, 07:26:48 AM »

So if the nations lawyer.. the guy tasked with enforcing the laws of our land...decides to fire some attorneys because they were prosecuting people from the wrong political party...or not prosecuting people from the other party...its OK with you?

daaayum.

Eagler · « **Reply #67 on:** August 28, 2007, 07:37:09 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
So if the nations lawyer.. the guy tasked with enforcing the laws of our land...decides to fire some attorneys because they were prosecuting people from the wrong political party...or not prosecuting people from the other party...its OK with you?

daaayum.

prove it
if it were true, he'd be behind bars .. just another dumbarsecrat witch hunt .. no wonder record low approval ratings for nancy and her bunch of terds LOL

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #68 on:** August 28, 2007, 07:39:13 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
So if the nations lawyer.. the guy tasked with enforcing the laws of our land...decides to fire some attorneys because they were prosecuting people from the wrong political party...or not prosecuting people from the other party...its OK with you?

daaayum.

Perfect example. This is what you believe actually happened.

When the reality is that those attorneys work solely at the discretion of the AG. He could hire a bunch of oompa-loompas if he wanted. Or fire all those with the middle name of mike.

midnight Target · « **Reply #69 on:** August 28, 2007, 08:04:46 AM »

You didn't answer the question. Typical dodge.

midnight Target · « **Reply #70 on:** August 28, 2007, 10:26:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
prove it

Kinda hard to do without an investigation... er witchhunt(TM).

lasersailor184 · « **Reply #71 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:27:51 PM »

Oh, I answered you perfectly, I just didn't type out HERE IS MY ANSWER.

jhookt · « **Reply #72 on:** August 28, 2007, 12:41:46 PM »

i'm just glad they are leaving, this administration has over stayed its welcome and personally i believe they have overstepped their bounds.

crockett · « **Reply #73 on:** August 28, 2007, 01:14:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by lasersailor184
Gonzales' ineffectiveness can only be attributed to the ramblings of the incoherent democratic party. What they did was akin to freaking out that Gonzales consumed Dihydrogen Monoxide. http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html

They took a common occurance, and by portraying it in a certain way, made it seem evil. When in effect, all Gonzales was doing was drinking water.

So now the fact that he either lied to congress or he actually can't remember anything is now the Democrats fault.

I'm waiting for the Iraq invasion to be blamed on the Democrats.. I'm sure in a few years the Right wingers will start blaming that one the Dem's as well.

Eagler · « **Reply #74 on:** August 28, 2007, 01:47:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
I'm waiting for the Iraq invasion to be blamed on the Democrats.. I'm sure in a few years the Right wingers will start blaming that one the Dem's as well.

except a few, they all voted for it didn't they? they were for it back in the 90's.. Bush's fault too I guess.

that's right, they were for the war before they were against it .. meaning .. before the media turned it into an anti administration theme as our men and women started dying, injured or maimed for life