I understand that this is mostly a figther plane game so the fewer gv's need luv (protection) also... but if what Lusche was saying is correct... that other planes guns can seriously hurt tanks... then the question becomes why not a Stuka's guns? A Stuka variant with atleast one notch up of amo would be nice, atleast for air fighting... fair/balanced/historical?
I am thankfull that atleast the rear gun is a double 7.92mm instead of a single. And I'm also thankful for the selections of bombloads - one day I'll understand the bomb damage stuff more to use them, till then its the 1800.
Issues though: I, II, and III
I) Which countries plane to fly?
A hurricane IIC654321ABCDEFG instead of a Stuka?
Oh yeah, sure, lets fly an enemies plane! Not happening!
Some of us 'uber' folks might only wish to fly the Stuka, a plane of the Grrrreat Geerrman LuUft'waffe!!!

Not a geighestcane nor an ILwuteva2 either!
II) We must have a bombload to take off?
The IL2, which by the way, in game, can take off without a bombload...
The stuka can't up if the Ordinance Building is down, and that alone, imho, totally completely sux really badly.
If the Arado can take off without a bombload, why does any plane have to? (think about it, only fixed rearward firing guns... I once was shot down by one though heh.)
So I hereby begeth thine ghods (of whatever) to make the Stuka able to take off without bombs... i.e. without having to have the Ordinance Building up, especially for those times when the fighter hangar is down. I understand that the hangar is kinda crowded with all of the appreciated bomb load selections; however, one more option is required. 'No bomb load' option please please pretty please, with sugar on top please!!!
One could speculate why the Ordinance Building is one of the first to be destroyed. I think it has to do with the goal of 'sustained long-term vultching' although I am quite sure that the reason is not to stop lil ole me from upping in my Stuka, unless they're skeerd!
Selective information about taking off and having to have a bomb load:
1) The Arado and TBM are the only two 'bombers' that can take off without a bomb load. TBM is like a stuka with an extra gun underneath. An Arado without bombs is a sight seeing plane for those without the points for a 262?
2) The TBM (bout 17k lbs) is similar to the Stuka(13k lbs), except that the TBM has an extra underneath gun facing backward. The TBM can, why can't a Stuka take off without bombs?
For bomber/attack planes:
3) Something odd is that the B5N (Japan torpedo bomber, about 8.3k lbs) cannot take off without bombs (or torpedo). So the TBM can but the B5N can't. B5N only as the rear firing gun so it wouldn't be a dogfiter anyways.
4) The IL2 and the Stuka weigh about 13k lbs... the IL2 can up with no bombs but the Stuka can't? Phooey!!! Fowl, Fake, not fair... booogus.
5) The SBD (USA dive bomber) and D3A (Japan divebomber) can but the Stuka (german divebomber) can't... again boooogus fake phooey no fair!
III) WHY IS THE STUKA's FLOOR WINDOW BLOCKED BY THE BOMB? realistic??? Window sposed to be forward more? Bomb size is too big?
I read somewhere that they started their dive-run after alligning the target thru that window. Hmm, I also remember seeing them roll to the side before diving also... hmm. Did the Junkers company mess up or have some graphical errors have occurred?
What seeems to be the problem? Schlowy
