Originally posted by Citabria
yep guppy that caiden guy likes to parade around as a "historian"
I read his p38 book and it read more like a work of fiction than anything I've read about ww2. the book is so crammed full of it its intollerable.
I like the fabrication about the p38 arriving back at base hours after its fuel would run out and the pilot dead with a headshot. mmm hmm. serious historian work going on there.
I grew up reading Caiden books in elementary school, in junior high school. When I got to "Fork Tailed Devil" and read his attempt to prove that the 38 really didn't have a bad kill-to-loss ratio in the ETO, I thought, "hey, something's not right here." Upon reflection and re-reading, I found that he'd been stretching things all along in most of his books. Go back to "Black Thursday," for example, and you'll see how one bomber managed to shoot down something like 10 of the German planes lost that day.
It was very disappointing, sort of the same feeling I had decades later with Stephen Ambrose's plagiarism. The books had been so good, it was sad to find that they were too good. For a real treat, see if you can scare up a copy of Caiden's "Flying Forts."
- oldman