Author Topic: Just Who Are They Protecting And Serving? (Read 662 times)

SkyRock · « **Reply #15 on:** September 26, 2007, 08:56:23 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
fine skyrock... then let's make it illegal for any public figure to have a private conversation with a lobbiest. make it so that all conversations have to be taped and that the tapes be made public record.

lazs

corruption would plummit!:aok

lazs2 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 26, 2007, 08:58:57 AM »

so do it. but don't try cherrypicking some common practice and sound outraged.

I do think you are naive if you think corruption would plummet tho.. They don't have to meet in public buildings and they can get their point across with few words anyway.

lazs

rpm · « **Reply #17 on:** September 26, 2007, 12:06:43 PM »

I'm not cherrypicking a common practice. I'm obeying the law. I'm listening to a District Judge and the State Attorney General. Yeah, I know a couple of liberals. Sorry to break it to ya Lazs, they are both Republicans. Why is the DPS (Department of Public Service... ironic, isn't it?) spending hundreds of thousands of dollars fighting to release surveillence tapes?

Lazs, where do you think you or I would be if we refused to turn over evidence to the DPS as ordered?

rpm · « **Reply #18 on:** September 26, 2007, 12:12:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dago
You're making assumptions and accusations based on evidence that you haven't seen. That isn't right. Dan Rather would be proud.

Nice fake outrage. Why don't they obey the Judge and AG?

john9001 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 26, 2007, 12:58:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by rpm
Nice fake outrage. Why don't they obey the Judge and AG?

because they no longer have the tapes, Sandy Burger stuck them in his pants.