Originally posted by Latrobe
I like the ideas but don't you think cv's would stand absolutly no chance if they were put into action? One pilot ups a formation of LANCs, and pays 400 perks for an extra formation. Now we got 6 LANCs inbound to a cv.
cv < LANCs
I say we perk all bombers no matter what they are because of the amount of ard they can carry.
I say we perk all fighters cause of their speed, maneuverability, and the fact if we damage them they can run to the nearest base. Where'as we are often far behind enemy lines. That, and if a bomber shoots you down, you can just jump to the next base in the line you know hes taking.
Overall, being serious, and Ive only been at this for a few months, I'd say the fighter/bomber battle is as equitable as a game can make it. I think the real problem is the strat system, that and dar bars in empty sectors. I like this idea cause not only would it give me something to spend my bomber perks on, but a 4'th bomber would be more effective against strats.
More effective, and more importance, on strats would open up more of the map and introduce more strategy in the game. I just flew B-17s for an hour against a Bish radar factory, with a fierce battle at a nearby airbase, and nobody bothered coming. If I want action against strats I have to fly against the Knights.
I think its a great idea Beef. That and bring in another perk bomber. The 234 is a wonderful perk but we bomber sticks need another.