Author Topic: New Tanks  (Read 1140 times)

Offline MajIssue

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 806
      • "False Prophets"
New Tanks
« Reply #15 on: October 04, 2007, 10:15:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Latrobe
I say we need more british tanks. How many we have now? zero

Brit tanks? is that like French fighters or Swiss cars?

Please inform me (seriously) of any UK armored vehicles in WW2 that would measure up to the current offerings in the game! I think it would be a short list. Druid has a good point in that the most extensive armor battles of the war were between the Soviet Union and Germany.

For laughs, my favorite quote on homefield advantage...
In WW2 the Germans had a better army but the Russians were tougher at home.
                         --Beano Cook on KJR-AM in Seattle
X.O. False Prophets
Altitude is Life
If you keep ignoring "Wife Ack" it will go away.

Offline latteral

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
New Tanks
« Reply #16 on: October 04, 2007, 10:48:49 AM »
If i overlooked this im sorry but wouldnt the Duplex drive tanks they used in the normandy landing be a good addition to the game, and should be easy to model.

    If i  am not mistaken they were modified shermans anyway to  make amphibious landings.  since the coding is there for the firelfy and for lvts  it could work and make carrier base assaults more fun at those that have no vehilce spawn .

  just thought i would throw that out.

                        latteral

Offline FrodeMk3

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2481
New Tanks
« Reply #17 on: October 04, 2007, 12:24:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MajIssue
Brit tanks? is that like French fighters or Swiss cars?

Please inform me (seriously) of any UK armored vehicles in WW2 that would measure up to the current offerings in the game! I think it would be a short list. Druid has a good point in that the most extensive armor battles of the war were between the Soviet Union and Germany.

For laughs, my favorite quote on homefield advantage...
In WW2 the Germans had a better army but the Russians were tougher at home.
                         --Beano Cook on KJR-AM in Seattle


The thing, Maj, is this: We could do something like El Alamein, if we had some Crusaders, Matilda's, or M-3 Lee's. The real key here is, when everything gets divided into EW, MW, and  LW, The GV set has massive holes in it, compared to the holes the planeset has.

And the crux of the whole thing is this: The GV game is really a sideshow to the Aerial fight. That's the reason that the planeset's have alot more to choose from.

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
New Tanks
« Reply #18 on: October 04, 2007, 01:26:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MajIssue
Brit tanks? is that like French fighters or Swiss cars?

Please inform me (seriously) of any UK armored vehicles in WW2 that would measure up to the current offerings in the game! I think it would be a short list. Druid has a good point in that the most extensive armor battles of the war were between the Soviet Union and Germany.

For laughs, my favorite quote on homefield advantage...
In WW2 the Germans had a better army but the Russians were tougher at home.
                         --Beano Cook on KJR-AM in Seattle



hmm haven't heard of the churchill tank have you . Very well designed with flat panel armour .much like the tiger and a nice rifled main gun ( so the shots would go where they were suposed to)  it had a 6pound anti tank gun MkII   or a 75mm gun Mk3 onwards.
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline Raptor

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7577
New Tanks
« Reply #19 on: October 04, 2007, 01:52:00 PM »
I want a US 76mm Sherman.



My ulitimate GV wish is an M-18 tank destroyer.

Offline MajIssue

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 806
      • "False Prophets"
New Tanks
« Reply #20 on: October 04, 2007, 02:03:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by FrodeMk3
The thing, Maj, is this: We could do something like El Alamein, if we had some Crusaders, Matilda's, or M-3 Lee's. The real key here is, when everything gets divided into EW, MW, and  LW, The GV set has massive holes in it, compared to the holes the planeset has.

And the crux of the whole thing is this: The GV game is really a sideshow to the Aerial fight. That's the reason that the planeset's have alot more to choose from.


Agreed... The GV game IS a sideshow... a very fun sideshow but a sideshow nonetheless. My knowledge of ww2 Armor is sadly lacking (which explains my post) please don't mistake my joking as a slight toward the Brits who afterall invented the tank. The historic truth as I see it is that there were design successes and failures on all sides of WW2, on the ground and in the air.

I would vote (if asked) to upgrade the GV set regardless of what countries vehicles are represented... more IS better
X.O. False Prophets
Altitude is Life
If you keep ignoring "Wife Ack" it will go away.

Offline MajIssue

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 806
      • "False Prophets"
New Tanks
« Reply #21 on: October 04, 2007, 02:07:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B3YT
hmm haven't heard of the churchill tank have you . Very well designed with flat panel armour .much like the tiger and a nice rifled main gun ( so the shots would go where they were suposed to)  it had a 6pound anti tank gun MkII   or a 75mm gun Mk3 onwards.


Please accept my most sincere apology... I couldn't resist using the reference to needle the French. No slight toward the British designs was intended. My knowledge of WW2 armor has as many holes as a JU-87 in a furball!
X.O. False Prophets
Altitude is Life
If you keep ignoring "Wife Ack" it will go away.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
New Tanks
« Reply #22 on: October 04, 2007, 02:25:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MajIssue
Brit tanks? is that like French fighters or Swiss cars?

Please inform me (seriously) of any UK armored vehicles in WW2 that would measure up to the current offerings in the game!


CRUISER TANKS (LATE WAR)
Challenger
Comet

Churchill Series
Churchill Mk. I
Churchill Mk. IV
Churchill Mk. VII

MODIFIED AMERICAN AFVS
Sherman VC Firefly
Achilles IIC


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
New Tanks
« Reply #23 on: October 04, 2007, 02:43:09 PM »
Actually the British are represented by the Sherman Firefly in the game. [/B][/QUOTE]

Actually the Firefly is not a British tank, it is an American tank with a British gun. Unfortunately the Brits did not make a tank that was anywhere comparable to anything  the German's had with exception to early German examples.

I also do not agree that nobody would use the Stug. If it had the L/48 75MM gun like the current Mark IV  that's in the game it would make a better ambush vehicle than the Mk IV due to it's lower profile, thicker and sloped armor around the fighting compartment and gun.

 If they had a Panther I don't believe that would give anyone an advantage. The Tiger, Firefly or another Panther would kill it one shot. Remember that the Tiger has the thickest armor of the lot and although the armor on the Panther is sloped  it really was only affective if shot at by low velocity AT rounds or at distance by others. Most high velocity ammo that late in the war could penetrate the Panthers sloped armor at fair distances. It was after all a medium tank .  The American M-10 tank destroyer would be a nice addition as well.

I have a number of books that rate all allied AT guns against all the German AFV's at various ranges and at different angles. It becomes evident that the vaunted German AFV's were able to be killed  by late war allied AFV's. There are exceptions like the King Tiger and the Jadg Tiger which were in a class of their own. But like stated, a 1000IB will kill anything.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
New Tanks
« Reply #24 on: October 04, 2007, 03:21:32 PM »
Were on this planet do you get your information BigPlay?

Time for some education:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cromwell_tank

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comet_tank

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
New Tanks
« Reply #25 on: October 04, 2007, 04:05:15 PM »
M-26 for late war would be nice.
:t

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
New Tanks
« Reply #26 on: October 04, 2007, 04:41:42 PM »
It had a mixed reception by crews. It was faster and had a lower profile than the Sherman tank. However, while its armour was of equivalent thickness, it was less sloped and therefore less effective than that of the Sherman. The 75 mm gun, though able to fire a useful HE shell, was not as effective against armour as the 6 pdr or the 17 pounder that was fitted to the British Firefly variant of the Sherman.

The Cromwell crews in North-West Europe succeeded in the Cromwell with superior speed, manoeuvrability and reliability outflanking the heavier and more sluggish German tanks; however, the Cromwell was still not a match for the best German armour and British tank design would go through another stage, the Comet tank, before going ahead in the tank development race with the Centurion tank.

This is right from your link. Read Panzer battles of the 1st and 12th SS pzr Div. in Normandy where most of these late model Brit tanks showed up. What was printed and what I read is they were slaughtered resulting in many commanding Generals to be replaced almost costing ole Monty his command. There was really no way that these tanks even in their numbers could battle dug in and on the defensive German tanks I will give you my reading material refrence if you need more convincing. P.S. These website links you attached lack the indepth information and first hand accounts and do little more than scratch the surface .

I have over 300 books on various WW2 weapons, guns and first hand battle accounts and have read them all more than once. I also have a business  that pertains to WW2 history, so I don't believe I need a history lesson. I'm not saying that I know everything , I still learn things all the time but my nose is always in a book regarding WW2 history. Sorry but hope as you might the Brits did not have a tank  that was capible of going head to head with German armor, they were more designed for infintry support, hence the regard made to a useful HE round and the refrence to not being affective against armor. The Russians where the sole reason that German armor came to be what it was and since the Brits had little interaction with the latest of German armor up until Normandy they really had fallen far behind in tank design. Also their tactics were as far as armor interaction with ground troops and flatout one on one tank battles were they were once again not in the same leage.

Offline ssDruid

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40
New Tanks
« Reply #27 on: October 04, 2007, 10:24:03 PM »
Bigplay
You are absolutely correct. There are many resource books on the subject of World War II armor. I think the Jensen and Doyle books on the Panther and Tigers are probably the most comprehensive around. They cost a pretty penny to get nowadays, but well worth the money. I happen to have them in my library.
I also agree with you on the STUG. What a marvelous vehicle it can be for ambushes. But i think we need to see some M4A3E8's in the game to represent the American side in the late war. Even the M10 would be a nice addition. How about the Caliope version also. Imagine hitting a town with those rockets.
:aok

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
New Tanks
« Reply #28 on: October 05, 2007, 02:54:46 PM »
Those are great books. Will Fey's Panzer Battles of the Eastern Front is one of the best as far as day to day fighting went for the average SS pzr. div. tank commander . I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in what tank warfare was really like in WW2.

There is a ton of afv's that would be a great addition to the game. What would really be cool  is a separate arena just for gv's and possibly a limited amount of aircraft. There is quite a few people that play just in the GV mode
so I think it would be popular. I sure this will stir a few die hard  pilots to react against a arena just for GV's, but that's what makes this game so much fun is you have a ton of options not just flying.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2007, 02:57:04 PM by BigPlay »