Author Topic: sodas aircraft evaluations  (Read 2421 times)

Offline Rollins

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
      • 4thFG
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #15 on: December 02, 2007, 12:54:57 PM »
Thank you good sir! :aok
http://www.flamewarriors.net    Here kitty kitty...

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #16 on: December 02, 2007, 01:45:54 PM »
i looked at the web site are you shure you posted it i cant see it the p-38 you need help with i think is the same as the p-38L but just doesnt have the hydrolicly boosted alarons the speeds are the same
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline Rollins

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
      • 4thFG
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #17 on: December 02, 2007, 02:46:12 PM »
^^^^^^
Anyone with a translation? :confused:
http://www.flamewarriors.net    Here kitty kitty...

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15724
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #18 on: December 02, 2007, 02:47:04 PM »
Yeah. Uhh.

Squeak
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #19 on: December 02, 2007, 04:18:41 PM »
wops sory my safari was acting up and wont refresh the page but i cant se the k-4 it says that the page annot be found both my computers say that:(
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2007, 09:53:23 PM »
You can't see it because he isn't done with it yet ! This is what Soda posted about the K4...........

" I have the K4 sheet mostly done, I just need to wrap up a couple of pieces of data and then will post."


Had you read the post through you would have seen he has updated a few planes.............

"I've put up an update today: Bf109G14, A6M2, A20, Spit XVI and Spit VIII"

He also said...... if you havn't read the whole post.... that he may never get the whole thing done again because he just doesn't have the time.

Be thankfull for what he has done. It takes a lot of time and effort to put this kind of stuff together.

Thanks Soda !!  

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #21 on: December 02, 2007, 10:06:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Fugitive
You can't see it because he isn't done with it yet ! This is what Soda posted about the K4...........

" I have the K4 sheet mostly done, I just need to wrap up a couple of pieces of data and then will post."


Had you read the post through you would have seen he has updated a few planes.............

"I've put up an update today: Bf109G14, A6M2, A20, Spit XVI and Spit VIII"

He also said...... if you havn't read the whole post.... that he may never get the whole thing done again because he just doesn't have the time.

Be thankfull for what he has done. It takes a lot of time and effort to put this kind of stuff together.

Thanks Soda !!  


Ummm, ok...  I have read through the whole post, and got that he had updated it with those specific planes mentioned.  I then went to the site, and saw that the K-4 had an asterisk by it, which according to his sight "indicates recent update."  I figured that since he was adding those planes that he had done the K-4 also.  When I clicked on its link nothing was there.  So I can here, and politely suggested that the link was broken, which was what I had thought had happened.  I didn't know that he hadn't finished it yet, until he then came on and replied with the

" I have the K4 sheet mostly done, I just need to wrap up a couple of pieces of data and then will post."

as you so nicely mentioned...  Now if you had read the whole thread you would have seen that I replied saying a "Sounds cool, thanks," in response to his response.  

Please don't come on here and assume that I am some ungrateful, unappreciative skim-threads and go through things quick kinda kid, because I am not.  I understand the work that has to be put into each of those entries, and how long it takes.  I am also aware that he doesn't have a lot of time to dedicate to it.  I am thankful for all that he has done so far.


donkey
2sBlind

Offline SAS_KID

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1098
      • http://www.myspace.com/saskid
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #22 on: December 03, 2007, 12:06:00 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DoNKeY
Ummm, ok...  I have read through the whole post, and got that he had updated it with those specific planes mentioned.  I then went to the site, and saw that the K-4 had an asterisk by it, which according to his sight "indicates recent update."  I figured that since he was adding those planes that he had done the K-4 also.  When I clicked on its link nothing was there.  So I can here, and politely suggested that the link was broken, which was what I had thought had happened.  I didn't know that he hadn't finished it yet, until he then came on and replied with the

" I have the K4 sheet mostly done, I just need to wrap up a couple of pieces of data and then will post."

as you so nicely mentioned...  Now if you had read the whole thread you would have seen that I replied saying a "Sounds cool, thanks," in response to his response.  

Please don't come on here and assume that I am some ungrateful, unappreciative skim-threads and go through things quick kinda kid, because I am not.  I understand the work that has to be put into each of those entries, and how long it takes.  I am also aware that he doesn't have a lot of time to dedicate to it.  I am thankful for all that he has done so far.


donkey


Hes responding to this.

"wops sory my safari was acting up and wont refresh the page but i cant se the k-4 it says that the page annot be found both my computers say that:confused: "
Quote from: hitech on Today at 09:27:26 AM
What utter and compete BS, quite frankly I should kick you off this bbs for this post.

The real truth is you do not like the answer.

HiTech

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #23 on: December 03, 2007, 12:09:45 AM »
Sorry fugitive, that's my bad, I apologize.  

donkey
2sBlind

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #24 on: December 03, 2007, 07:26:51 AM »
no problem Donkey <---- always say that with a "Shrek" voice in my head.... I should have been a bit more clear on who I was "teaching"  :D

Offline DoNKeY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #25 on: December 03, 2007, 10:18:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Fugitive
no problem Donkey <---- always say that with a "Shrek" voice




:rofl :rofl
2sBlind

Offline splitatom

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 765
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2007, 05:27:03 PM »
i also cant se the f4u-1A the p47d-40 says p47d-30
snowey flying since tour 78

Offline Soda

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1543
      • http://members.shaw.ca/soda_p/models.htm
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2007, 10:11:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by SlapShot
Great to hear from you Soda ... <> ... hope all is well in Canada.


It's damn cold here right now, maybe that's why I've retreated back to my den with a little spare time to do some updates.  That is NOT an invitation to wish for more cold for me so that I write more pages up :)

Ok, the 109K-4 is posted (hopefully I won't get slammed over it because at best I've flown it casually many months ago).  I'm aware that the P-38J, F4U-1a and P-47D40 aren't working but I probably won't make that a priority.  Those are left-overs from a previous version of the website and some earlier models of those aircraft but I'm not sure they are all that popular with some of the other models available (tell me if I'm wrong but I think the time would be better spent on other aircraft or different project).

Offline Ongurth

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
      • http://www.christiancs.com
sodas aircraft evaluations
« Reply #28 on: December 05, 2007, 09:37:28 PM »
Soda!

I find your aircraft evaluations very helpful and I would not have been able to stick with this game when I started last January, if it hadn't been for your aircraft dossiers.  Thank you so much for putting them together.



For what it's worth, I think that an evaluation of the F4U-1A would be worth while, as I had a hard time getting a feel for what the plane was like when I started.

Offline Twolf2

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Thanks
« Reply #29 on: December 12, 2007, 01:39:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Soda
It's damn cold here right now, maybe that's why I've retreated back to my den with a little spare time to do some updates.  That is NOT an invitation to wish for more cold for me so that I write more pages up :)

Ok, the 109K-4 is posted (hopefully I won't get slammed over it because at best I've flown it casually many months ago).  I'm aware that the P-38J, F4U-1a and P-47D40 aren't working but I probably won't make that a priority.  Those are left-overs from a previous version of the website and some earlier models of those aircraft but I'm not sure they are all that popular with some of the other models available (tell me if I'm wrong but I think the time would be better spent on other aircraft or different project).




Thanks for all the hard work Soda. Your info is extremely helpful!!!!

<>