Author Topic: X1950 Pro vs 8600GT Extreme  (Read 771 times)

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
X1950 Pro vs 8600GT Extreme
« Reply #15 on: November 01, 2007, 03:48:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
The main reason I've supported Ati for was and is image quality. Especially older nvidia cards absolutely sucked on 2D desktop.


And if you use TV-out - then the difference is even more obvious.

I use my PC as a home-theater, attached to 29" or 33" CRT TVs (my place and Father's), and Nvidia simply can't be compared to any ATI board since 7500.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
X1950 Pro vs 8600GT Extreme
« Reply #16 on: November 02, 2007, 03:01:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
And if you use TV-out - then the difference is even more obvious.

I use my PC as a home-theater, attached to 29" or 33" CRT TVs (my place and Father's), and Nvidia simply can't be compared to any ATI board since 7500.


This problem is gone with DVI-D luckily. My 8800GTS has a crystal clear image.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Boroda

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5755
X1950 Pro vs 8600GT Extreme
« Reply #17 on: November 02, 2007, 08:26:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrRiplEy[H]
This problem is gone with DVI-D luckily. My 8800GTS has a crystal clear image.


Sure, you just skip using the ****ty on-board RAMDAC. But I was speaking about purely analog CRT-TV via S-VHS cable.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
X1950 Pro vs 8600GT Extreme
« Reply #18 on: November 02, 2007, 12:53:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Boroda
Sure, you just skip using the ****ty on-board RAMDAC. But I was speaking about purely analog CRT-TV via S-VHS cable.


I know exactly what you talk about.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone