Originally posted by Yeager
Engineering always builds a safefty value into the rated G limit specifications.
Not true. Today that's true for commercial aircraft (150%) and only because some agencies like FAA require that. Different applications, different requirements...
If you build a plane able to withstand 160% means your engineering is bad, because that extra 10-% adds extra weight.
During WWII USAF required roughly 7.3 Gs, safety extras included. Navy had yet again different requirements, so did different countries... Most of manufactures kept to those specs or went just slightly above.
Originally posted by Yeager
The P51 was able to endure considerably more than the rated +8 Gs/-4 Gs.
It wasn't. In fact, it was rated for those +8/-4 Gs at 8,000lbs load and only D model. At 12,000Lbs it was rated about +5/-2.5 Gs. Everything above that and you are in danger of sustaining a structural damage.
Originally posted by Yeager
Memory recalls some engineering facts on the P51 suggesting +15 Gs was the structural failure point.
Not true. Every time you went above the limit you were in danger of structural failure. That doesn't mean wings would fall off at 8Gs automatically, very often skin would warp a little, sometimes spar, etc...
Originally posted by Yeager
The fact I will point out again was that in AH the early P51s used to shed their wing at precisely +8 Gs. Everytime like clockwork. As I recall, complaints about this saw the next patch bring that faulire point out well past 14 Gs. Try it.
In AH p-51 wings break at about 12 Gs and above, even at full load...