Author Topic: Bush named in CIA leak case (Read 1162 times)

Arlo · « **Reply #15 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:15:45 PM »

About as relevant as a blowjob.

JB88 · « **Reply #16 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:18:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
it makes it irrelevant

it makes it unethical and illegal.

john9001 · « **Reply #17 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:19:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
About as relevant as a blowjob.

it wasn't about a blowjob, it was about lying under oath.

JB88 · « **Reply #18 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:20:33 PM »

ohhhh, lying.

sooooo....(fill in the blanks)

Arlo · « **Reply #19 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:21:42 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
it wasn't about a blowjob, it was about lying under oath.

Ain't that kinda like "It's not about reasonable suspician, it's about resisting arrest?"

rpm · « **Reply #20 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:22:08 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Eagler
this is about blowing the cover of some ho who wasn't even under cover?

no witch hunt here

LOL

According to Plame herself, she was indeed undercover working on the WMD in Iraq. She was a covert operative, not a secretary or a "ho". If she was not working on classified stuff, why did the CIA censor 80% of her book describing her duties as classified?

john9001 · « **Reply #21 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:26:32 PM »

she was a analyst working at CIA HQ, and if she a secret agent how do you know what she was working on?

Arlo · « **Reply #22 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:32:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
she was a analyst working at CIA HQ, and if she a secret agent how do you know what she was working on?

Proudly obtuse! (shakes head)

I doubt either of you even knew she existed before the Bush administration set in motion the events that made ... front ... page .... news.

FBplmmr · « **Reply #23 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:46:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Arlo
Proudly obtuse! (shakes head)

I doubt either of you even knew she existed before the Bush administration set in motion the events that made ... front ... page .... news.

Soo..does that make me a secret agent too? Will I be receiving one of those nifty decoder rings?

Arlo · « **Reply #24 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:54:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by FBplmmr
Soo..does that make me a secret agent too? Will I be receiving one of those nifty decoder rings?

Yeah. Your agent identity code will be T.A.R.D. 007.

B@tfinkV · « **Reply #25 on:** November 21, 2007, 06:58:47 PM »

oh great one arlo, posting publicly? might as well go tell all the terrorists his agent id code and current location....duh...in-cog-ni-to

john9001 · « **Reply #26 on:** November 21, 2007, 07:00:22 PM »

Novak did not name her, he only said that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, it was Wilson who "outed" his own wife by naming her.

Arlo · « **Reply #27 on:** November 21, 2007, 07:03:27 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by B@tfinkV
oh great one arlo, posting publicly? might as well go tell all the terrorists his agent id code and current location....duh...in-cog-ni-to

I take full responsibility for any and all repercussions. The buck stops here.

Arlo · « **Reply #28 on:** November 21, 2007, 07:05:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
Novak did not name her, he only said that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA, it was Wilson who "outed" his own wife by naming her.

I guess, by that logic, if I tell everyone that your wife's husband is an idiot I'm not revealing anything derogatory about you?

rpm · « **Reply #29 on:** November 21, 2007, 07:07:30 PM »

John, this may come as a shock to you, but she has done interviews. How many have you watched or read before forming your opinion?