Originally posted by SIG220
But that would mean giving an instant death sentence, at a time when more states are moving to outlaw the death penalty, like New Jersey currently is.
If I shoot my .45 at someone, I am pretty certain that they are going to probably die.
SIG 220
There is a vivid difference between a "death sentence" which would connotate a moral judgment and who should be making that judgment, as contrasted to cause and affect in a shooting situation in progress, in my well considered opinion.
If a man were holding a gun and is about to shoot your child and he has already shot other people's children who are laying dead and dying and you had a concealed gun, what would you do?
This is an effort to empathize in another way... empathy for your child's life over the live of a gunman in the act of killing your child.
In my view it is morally justified and your duty to take that gunman down.
I can understand that you are a moral person and do not wish to take life unnecessarily... there is a lot to be considered with an open mind.
A taser will probably not kill a person; a gun probably would.
Will the taser protect you and your family from a gang of three?
What if it doesn't work for some simple reasons like its winter time and the bad guys beant on harming you or your family are wearing thick coats which prevents the darts from making electrical contact with skin?
When deciding taser or firearm, will your life or the lives of others hang in the balance depending on your decision?
The police aren't using tasers on people with guns who are shooting at people... and for a lot of reasons I can think of.
If a kid was bashing my child with a baseball bat and I could not separate them and had a taser and a concealed gun, I would use the taser... no question.
TIGERESS