Author Topic: The Su-85 tank Destroyer  (Read 783 times)

Offline Eric122

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« on: March 22, 2010, 08:16:18 PM »
this was a soviet tank destroyer it could be used to defend ports,vehicle bases, airfields, and citys. you can set it in place and use its large gun to fend off attacking tanks and use it as artillery against troops and mabe pt boats.

Offline Flipperk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1185
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2010, 01:03:03 AM »
this was a soviet tank destroyer it could be used to defend ports,vehicle bases, airfields, and citys. you can set it in place and use its large gun to fend off attacking tanks and use it as artillery against troops and mabe pt boats.



 :x :x

This sounds great already!!
It is 2 Cents or .02 Dollars...NOT .02 Cents!

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2010, 12:23:23 PM »
New guy does have a lot of wishes................
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline haphazardleek

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2010, 03:42:04 PM »
+1

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2010, 04:03:35 PM »
We pretty much already have on of these...T-34-85...the 1943 model used the same main gun.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Eric122

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 95
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2010, 04:07:19 PM »
i think i got this and the su-122 mixed up but they both would work

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2010, 09:03:48 PM »
Having a tracked vehicle without a turret in AH, at least with the current coding for steering (lack of "zero turn" capability) would be suicide.

Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2010, 01:12:19 AM »
suicide is good smokinloon :aok and which WWII vehicle was the first with zero turn btw?
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Flipperk

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1185
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2010, 11:18:07 PM »
suicide is good smokinloon :aok and which WWII vehicle was the first with zero turn btw?

Stug?
It is 2 Cents or .02 Dollars...NOT .02 Cents!

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2010, 06:47:04 AM »
Stug?
I actually thought it was the Pnzr VI Tiger tank
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline fbEagle

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 584
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2010, 12:46:50 PM »
You mean this thing? Sure why not! +1 :aok
<Insert witty remark here>

Offline Ultimate

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 45
Re: The Su-85 tank Destroyer
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2010, 04:26:02 PM »
I would welcome any new GV.  :aok