Author Topic: Request for next plane to be updated... (Read 3491 times)

moot · « **Reply #15 on:** December 19, 2007, 10:16:48 PM »

Stoney, word on the grapevine is that HTC redo planes one at a time, as totaly as they can. The 190s were updated in physics and graphics, but the 152 wasn't. I'd say the F4Us are the same.

I don't think planes' 3D model and FM have any corelation.

PhantomBarron · « **Reply #16 on:** December 19, 2007, 11:09:05 PM »

Orriginal post for the 110 is my vote. Then the A20 and the F6F then the Ostwind, then the C205, then the ...

Gixer · « **Reply #17 on:** December 20, 2007, 01:39:05 AM »

Yak's and LA's

~~...-Gixer~~

Krusty · « **Reply #18 on:** December 20, 2007, 09:02:15 AM »

Stoney, the two (FM and graphic model) are not completely related, as you can update the FM and not the graphics. However, as HTC is redoing the old models they are upgrading the raher buggy FMs to better FM standards. I would guess this includes more points on the wing where airflow is sampled. If you recall pics of the new Corsair stall patterns some time back, I think they go through all of that and produce a much more competent flight model than the old AH1 beta days could provide.

Bodhi · « **Reply #19 on:** December 20, 2007, 02:56:58 PM »

I think an argument could definitely be made for the 110, F6F, and Zero. Maybe even the Yak's and La 5's.

SuBWaYCH · « **Reply #20 on:** December 20, 2007, 03:23:52 PM »

Yak9-T could use a facelift. 9-U doesn't need it as much, but it could use one as well. TA-152 needs some updating, along with Hellcat and Zeke.
Boston as well.

Regards,
Subway

Krusty · « **Reply #21 on:** December 20, 2007, 03:44:26 PM »

You know, I understand it's low priority, but I'd REALLY love to see the lancasters redone. Not only to allow us to properly skin it (with the 1 skin used on every plane ever built

) but because the damage model soaks up 30mms right now, and it never catches fire. I'd like to see it redone so that the damage is applied properly.

I wouldn't care if we got the 4x .303 tail turret as some have asked, or if we stick with the 2x .50cals. The 50s are better (it's a fact) but the .303s would be cooler.

Xasthur · « **Reply #22 on:** December 20, 2007, 05:44:57 PM »

<----

33Vortex · « **Reply #23 on:** December 20, 2007, 05:50:15 PM »

splitatom · « **Reply #24 on:** December 20, 2007, 06:01:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gixer
LA's

~~...-Gixer~~

noobs dont need a good looking hoe wagon:D
and this is what the noobs are going to do:cry

Tilt · « **Reply #25 on:** December 21, 2007, 10:16:09 AM »

Lavochkins please.................

bsdaddict · « **Reply #26 on:** December 22, 2007, 09:22:44 AM »

since it's one of my two main rides I'll selfishly add my vote for the hellcat to be updated. Throw some cannons on it while you're at it pls pls k thx.

Karnak · « **Reply #27 on:** December 22, 2007, 11:04:27 AM »

No cannons on the F6F please. The three cannon La-7 is bad enough, we don't need rare loadouts being used as the most common (by far) in the game.

Same response to the requests for four cannon Spitfires. No.

But definately update the F6F's graphics and flight model. The N1K2-J's as well (autoflaps if possible).

moot · « **Reply #28 on:** December 22, 2007, 11:52:29 AM »

I wouldn't mind perk loadouts... It would be awesome in CT.

A8TOOL · « **Reply #29 on:** December 24, 2007, 12:44:49 PM »

The F6F has been on this type of list for a LOOONG time as far as i know. It deserves to be the last one fixed and placed on HTC's two more weeks list ASAp so we know not to expect it anytime soon